2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic particle-based chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay for free thyroxine in human serum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the linear concentration range of the microsensor based on TEX/DP covers the normal range of f‐L‐T4 in serum and the linear concentration range of the stochastic microsensor HD/DP includes the normal range of f‐L‐T 3 in the serum, showing their ability to be used in the diagnosis of thyroid disease (i.e., subclinical hypo‐ and hyperthyroidism). Compared with the most frequently used techniques such as immunometric assays, the limit of determination for f‐L‐T 4 obtained using the microsensor based on TEX/DP is lower than the one reported using the ELISA kit (5.15 x 10 ‐12 molL ‐1 ), RIA kit (2.57 x 10 ‐12 molL ‐1 ) and CLEIA (1.59 x 10 ‐12 molL ‐1 ) . Compared with the best results in the literature (1.29 x 10 ‐9 molL ‐1 ) for the enantiorecognition of f‐D‐T 4 using the TEX/DP‐based microsensor, it registered a lower limit of determination and also using the IQ/DP‐based microsensor for the detection of to f‐L‐T 3 was obtained with a very close limit of determination to the ELISA kit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the linear concentration range of the microsensor based on TEX/DP covers the normal range of f‐L‐T4 in serum and the linear concentration range of the stochastic microsensor HD/DP includes the normal range of f‐L‐T 3 in the serum, showing their ability to be used in the diagnosis of thyroid disease (i.e., subclinical hypo‐ and hyperthyroidism). Compared with the most frequently used techniques such as immunometric assays, the limit of determination for f‐L‐T 4 obtained using the microsensor based on TEX/DP is lower than the one reported using the ELISA kit (5.15 x 10 ‐12 molL ‐1 ), RIA kit (2.57 x 10 ‐12 molL ‐1 ) and CLEIA (1.59 x 10 ‐12 molL ‐1 ) . Compared with the best results in the literature (1.29 x 10 ‐9 molL ‐1 ) for the enantiorecognition of f‐D‐T 4 using the TEX/DP‐based microsensor, it registered a lower limit of determination and also using the IQ/DP‐based microsensor for the detection of to f‐L‐T 3 was obtained with a very close limit of determination to the ELISA kit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Compared with the most frequently used techniques such as immunometric assays, the limit of determination for f-L-T 4 obtained using the microsensor based on TEX/DP is lower than the one reported using the ELISA kit (5.15 x 10 -12 molL -1 ), RIA kit (2.57 x 10 -12 molL -1 ) and CLEIA (1.59 x 10 -12 molL -1 ). 26 Compared with the best results in the literature (1.29 x 10 -9 molL -1 ) 27 for the enantiorecognition of f-D-T 4 using the TEX/DP-based microsensor, it registered a lower limit of determination and also using the IQ/DP-based microsensor for the detection of to f-L-T 3 was obtained with a very close limit of determination to the ELISA kit.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Response Characteristics Of The Stochmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Since the Ag+Ag*+Ab incubation is carried out in a homogenous solution in this assay, the binding equilibrium can be reached within 15 min. However, an incubation time of 45 min or longer is normally required in the widely used heterogeneous immunoassays based on Ab-coated micro-plates [2] or magnetic particles [32] due to the limited interaction among the analyte, the reagents and the immobilized antibody. Further, the MCE separation of Ag*-Ab from Ag* in this assay is very quick (< 1 min), which represents a distinct advantage of MCE over other separation techniques such as HPLC and capillary electrophoresis (CE).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conjugates of SAV and MSPs are widely utilized for bioaffinity separation, detection and indirect immobilization of biotinylated biomolecules, 19,20,[33][34][35]38 and are pivotal biomaterials in reagent kits for automated chemiluminescence immunoassays in clinical laboratories. [41][42][43] Hence, we examined the immobilization of SAV on MSP-PEG-COOH via N-acylation. MSP-PEG-D4 after the activation of carboxyl groups immobilized SAV at about 10 mg/g MSPs via N-acylation ( Figure 9).…”
Section: Immobilization Of Streptavidinmentioning
confidence: 99%