2016
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201504176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic‐Nanoparticle‐Based Immunoassays‐on‐Chip: Materials Synthesis, Surface Functionalization, and Cancer Cell Screening

Abstract: The unique properties of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), coupled with versatile surface engineering techniques, have led to a rising class of screening methods that enable separation of specific cell populations from complex biological samples. The growing sophistication and efficiency of these methods have far reaching implications for both fundamental research and clinical applications. In this study, the synthesis and surface engineering of MNPs is reviewed. Here, a model is introduced to illustrate how MNP … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 219 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A series of techniques have been established to enrich or capture CTCs for cell enumeration and phenotype analysis . Immunomagnetic separation represents a promising approach for clinical use because of its capability to rapidly process a large volume of samples as well as easy operation and facile cell recovery by the end users . However, most of the magnetic bead‐based separation suffers from low capture purities (CPs) that compromise detection accuracy and complicate downstream analysis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of techniques have been established to enrich or capture CTCs for cell enumeration and phenotype analysis . Immunomagnetic separation represents a promising approach for clinical use because of its capability to rapidly process a large volume of samples as well as easy operation and facile cell recovery by the end users . However, most of the magnetic bead‐based separation suffers from low capture purities (CPs) that compromise detection accuracy and complicate downstream analysis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wet chemical methods have been studied more widely than physical ones, since they can provide a higher level of control over the size, composition, magnetic properties, and the form of magnetic nanopar-ticles. This is especially important for screening cells in a liquid medium (Zhu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] Since the amount of CTCs is extremely exiguous in patients' blood, [7][8][9] there is an imperative demand to capture and enrich CTCs with high efficiency accordingly. In the last few years, multitudinous systems have been reported for the separation and enrichment of CTCs such as magnetic isolation technology, [10][11][12][13] microuidic technology [14][15][16][17] and ow cytometry. 18,19 Most of the above methods relied on a single CTC marker to capture CTC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%