2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic multi-porous bio-adsorbent modified with amino siloxane for fast removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the composites prepared with the resin Dowex 50 WX4 were the most efficient in the removal of Ni(II), Cu(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II), showing an adsorption capacity of 384, 416, 398 and 380 mg/g, respectively [45]. These values are higher than the data registered for other composites obtained from carbon nanotubes [34], α-cellulose [40], chitosan [41][42][43], silica [53], starch [54] and different types of biomass such as waste orange peel, pine bark and Cyclosorus interruptus (see Table 3) [33,50,55]. Additionally, it is relevant to mention that for the removal of Cr(VI), the composite obtained with poly(vinylidene fluoride) shows the higher adsorption capacity (1423.4 mg/g) in comparison with the samples prepared from chitosan (46 mg/g), cotton (3.74 mg/g) and Dowex 50 WX4 resin (400 mg/g) [41,44,45].…”
Section: Magnetic Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the composites prepared with the resin Dowex 50 WX4 were the most efficient in the removal of Ni(II), Cu(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II), showing an adsorption capacity of 384, 416, 398 and 380 mg/g, respectively [45]. These values are higher than the data registered for other composites obtained from carbon nanotubes [34], α-cellulose [40], chitosan [41][42][43], silica [53], starch [54] and different types of biomass such as waste orange peel, pine bark and Cyclosorus interruptus (see Table 3) [33,50,55]. Additionally, it is relevant to mention that for the removal of Cr(VI), the composite obtained with poly(vinylidene fluoride) shows the higher adsorption capacity (1423.4 mg/g) in comparison with the samples prepared from chitosan (46 mg/g), cotton (3.74 mg/g) and Dowex 50 WX4 resin (400 mg/g) [41,44,45].…”
Section: Magnetic Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The term "magnetic adsorbent" is commonly used to describe the materials derived from iron (particles of γ-Fe 2 O 3 , Fe 3 O 4 and CoFe 2 O 3 ) or composites prepared from different types of matrix modified with iron compounds, which are used in the adsorption of water contaminants [33]. Particularly, for the adsorption of heavy metals from water, the principal magnetic adsorbents used are the composites, which are prepared with different methodologies using iron compounds and a specific matrix such as activated carbon, biochar, carbon nanotubes, α-cellulose, chitosan, cotton, resins, silica, starch, polymers, different type of biomass, and so on (see Table 3) .…”
Section: Magnetic Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, magnetic adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals have been developed as a composite of iron oxide and other compounds (i.e., biochar, chitosan, cellulose, graphene oxide, and titanate) [9,10,[22][23][24]. Among them, only a few materials, such as magnetic ion-imprinted polymer and magnetic biomaterial coated with amino siloxane, have been reported as selective adsorbents for lead [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many technologies, such as membrane filtration, electrolysis, ion‐exchange, adsorption and precipitation, have been studied for the treatment of heavy metals in effluents. Specially, adsorption is considered to be one of the most effective methods for removal of contaminants . For the adsorption method, the focus of the research is to obtain adsorptive materials with excellent properties and easy preparation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%