2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2008
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2008.4739256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic momentum management for a geostationary satellite platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its intuitive interpretation, it seems that formally showing desirable stabilization properties of the overall controller (6), (14), (16) is not so straightforward. Some directions are given with respect to this in [3], [4], [6], [9], [15], [23] where a frequency separation argument is required between the two loops cited above, which corresponds to selecting a very aggressive action of the attitude stabilizer (14). This can be performed, for example, by selecting sufficiently large gains c and K ω in (6).…”
Section: A the Classical Cross-product Control Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its intuitive interpretation, it seems that formally showing desirable stabilization properties of the overall controller (6), (14), (16) is not so straightforward. Some directions are given with respect to this in [3], [4], [6], [9], [15], [23] where a frequency separation argument is required between the two loops cited above, which corresponds to selecting a very aggressive action of the attitude stabilizer (14). This can be performed, for example, by selecting sufficiently large gains c and K ω in (6).…”
Section: A the Classical Cross-product Control Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that periodic systems broadly exist in natural science and practical engineering fields, such as satellite attitude control systems [1], rotor‐blade systems [2], communication systems [3]. Periodic control also has extensive applications in many fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these, Hablani [7] proposed a linear orbit-averaged magnetic controller using pole placement technique, Burns and Flashner [8] proposed a model reference adaptive scheme, Lovera [9] proposed a magnetic momentum unloading control law using optimal control theory, and Iida and Ninomiya [10] presented a non-linear magnetic control law using estimated environmental disturbance torque. The aforementioned studies mainly are limited to low Earth orbit spacecraft; in a recent study [11], robustness of a cross-product control law applied to a geostationary Earth orbit spacecraft (due to the unpredictable nature of magnetic field at this altitude) has been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%