2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.134422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic moment ofFe3O4films with thicknesses near the unit-cell size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the former case, while there is a reported work with a measured electron mean free path of 4.5 nm [28], Goering has argued that a much lower value is appropriate, in the range of 0.8 nm. Such a number has been recently confirmed by experiments in ultrathin films where an estimate of 1.3 nm was measured [29]. In such case the spectra would not be expected to differ much for the two kinetic energies (mean free path of 0.5 and 0.8 nm, respectively), and thus both spectra would be expected to provide a high sensitivity to the near surface structure of the crystal.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…For the former case, while there is a reported work with a measured electron mean free path of 4.5 nm [28], Goering has argued that a much lower value is appropriate, in the range of 0.8 nm. Such a number has been recently confirmed by experiments in ultrathin films where an estimate of 1.3 nm was measured [29]. In such case the spectra would not be expected to differ much for the two kinetic energies (mean free path of 0.5 and 0.8 nm, respectively), and thus both spectra would be expected to provide a high sensitivity to the near surface structure of the crystal.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…There are some reports concerning the possible existence of a magnetically dead layer at the interface [41][42][43], but others ascribe the decrease of the magnetization in the thin films to the presence of antiphase boundaries leading to superparamagnetic behavior of the domains [44][45][46]. Our findings may give credit to the proponents of the dead magnetic layer model.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, the latter is expected to be small for transition metal compounds at room temperature 49 . Self-absorption effects can also be neglected since we are measuring secondary electrons and the probing depth of the order of 1 nm 50 is well below the x-ray absorption length even for grazing incidence (10 and 20 nm at L 3 and L 2 edges, respectively). The moments obtained are m orb = 0.18 μ B and m spin = 0.94 μ B for Fe and m orb = 0.13 μ B and m spin = 1.13 μ B for Ni per cation, giving a total moment of 3.4 μ B per formula unit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%