1997
DOI: 10.1007/pl00005734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic mismatch fields elicited by vowels and consonants

Abstract: Auditory-evoked mismatch fields (MMFs) elicited by vowel contrasts and plosive stop consonant place-of-articulation contrasts were recorded over the left hemisphere of neurologically and audiologically normal subjects. Two experiments were conducted: vowels were presented in isolation in experiment 1 and embedded in consonant-vowel syllables in experiment 2. Bestfit equivalent MMF sources were obtained using the model of a single, spatiotemporal current dipole in a sphere. In both experiments, MMF sources acti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, no differences in location or magnitude could be demonstrated between the various deviants. This is somewhat inconsistent with reports that the location of the MMF source depends on the dimension of change (Giard et al, 1995;Alho et al, 1996;FrodlBauch et al, 1997;Diesch and Luce, 1997;Takegata et al, 2001). However, most of these studies used nonspeech sounds, which were varied in pitch/ frequency, duration, intensity, or sound location.…”
Section: Hemispherical Specializationmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, no differences in location or magnitude could be demonstrated between the various deviants. This is somewhat inconsistent with reports that the location of the MMF source depends on the dimension of change (Giard et al, 1995;Alho et al, 1996;FrodlBauch et al, 1997;Diesch and Luce, 1997;Takegata et al, 2001). However, most of these studies used nonspeech sounds, which were varied in pitch/ frequency, duration, intensity, or sound location.…”
Section: Hemispherical Specializationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, most of these studies used nonspeech sounds, which were varied in pitch/ frequency, duration, intensity, or sound location. With respect to higher level parameters, Diesch and Luce (1997) presented evidence for the existence of different neuronal populations underlying the MMN elicited by different phonetic contrasts in consonant-vowel syllables. The dipole positions differed at most about 10 mm in the horizontal plane.…”
Section: Hemispherical Specializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may contribute to the defective language development in individuals with CPO. The shorter STM in the subgroup with CPO at the age of 7 to 9 years could then be an expression of poorer STM traces, because poorer memory trace definition results faster decay due to the neural and external interference (Diesch 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mismatch negativity and its magnetic counterpart MMF are considered to reflect the detection of dissimilarity between the signal and the stimulus represented by previous auditory memory traces (7). Mismatch responses have been observed for rising vs. falling glides (8) and phonetic contrasts (9,10). A phonetically relevant change in the stimuli (a transition of the second formant signaling a consonantal change) has been found to produce an MMF, despite variation of F0 in both standard and deviant stimuli (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%