Magnetic guidance of charged particles

Abstract

Many experiments and devices in physics use static magnetic fields to guide charged particles from a source onto a detector, and we ask the innocent question: What is the distribution of particle intensity over the detector surface? One should think that the solution to this seemingly simple problem is well known. We show that, even for uniform guide fields, this is not the case and present analytical point spread functions (PSF) for magnetic transport that deviate strongly from previous results. The "magnetic" PSF shows unexpected singularities, which were recently also observed experimentally, and which make detector response very sensitive to minute changes of position, field amplitude, or particle energy. In the field of low-energy particle physics, these singularities may become a source of error in modern high precision experiments, or may be used for instrument tests, for instance in neutrino mass retardation spectrometers.Comment: 16 pages, 5 figures, version 2: improved approximation metho

Measurement of the Weak Axial-Vector Coupling Constant in the Decay of Free Neutrons Using a Pulsed Cold Neutron Beam

“…As a major improvement over previous Perkeo measurements, the variation of the detector amplitude over the area covered by decay electrons was < ±2.5 %. The effect of the detector non-uniformity on our result is dominated by the dependence of the magnetic pointspread function on the beta asymmetry [25,43] and the difference in detector coverage of beta asymmetry and calibration measurements. After unblinding we corrected the geometrical coverage of the detector using a previously unapplied analysis, which shifted the result by less than ∆λ/10.…”

Differences between Russian and Czech in the Use of Aspect in Narrative Discourse and Factual Contexts

“…Dickey argues that even though Czech has general-factual IPFs, there are no general-factuals with achievements. 29 He illustrates this with the contrasts in (46) (from Dickey 2000, pp. 99, 101) and in (47) (from Dickey 2000, pp.…”

Limit on the Fierz Interference Term b from a Measurement of the Beta Asymmetry in Neutron Decay

“…The difference in detector coverage between calibration measurements and measurements of the beta asymmetry leads to a small change in the effective signal response for the two types of measurements. This includes the dependence of the magnetic point-spread of electrons on the beta asymmetry itself [36,37]. In order to account for these differences, the corresponding spectral corrections are calculated using photon transport simulations performed with geant4 [38] which are matched to the measured spatial detector response.…”