2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic graphene oxide based nano-composites for removal of radionuclides and metals from contaminated solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Centrifugation, sedimentation, filtration, and other traditional separation methods deem to be ineffective and time consuming. On the other hand, magnetic GO (mGO) is synthesized via impregnation or co-precipitation methods [23][24][25][26][27] and can be easily separated by the aid of magnetic materials like Fe 3 O 4 or Fe 3 S 4. mGO is synthesized via impregnation or co-precipitation methods [23][24][25][26][27]. In the co-precipitation method, mGO is synthesized via the hydrothermal process by an in-situ reduction/decomposition of a metal precursor such as Fe 3 O 4, FeSO 4 , Fe(NO) 3 , or iron acetate on the surface of dispersed GO under sonication, see Figure 4.…”
Section: Magnetic Nanocomposites and Nanocomposites With Other Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centrifugation, sedimentation, filtration, and other traditional separation methods deem to be ineffective and time consuming. On the other hand, magnetic GO (mGO) is synthesized via impregnation or co-precipitation methods [23][24][25][26][27] and can be easily separated by the aid of magnetic materials like Fe 3 O 4 or Fe 3 S 4. mGO is synthesized via impregnation or co-precipitation methods [23][24][25][26][27]. In the co-precipitation method, mGO is synthesized via the hydrothermal process by an in-situ reduction/decomposition of a metal precursor such as Fe 3 O 4, FeSO 4 , Fe(NO) 3 , or iron acetate on the surface of dispersed GO under sonication, see Figure 4.…”
Section: Magnetic Nanocomposites and Nanocomposites With Other Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separation factor, R L , values revealed a favorably sorption process, and the higher values of Freundlich constant, K F , obtained for CGCS_CPLH + , irrespective of the investigated HMI, supported the capacity enhancement by addition of CPLH + onto CGCS cryogel network. Parameter n indicated the strong sorption of Cu 2+ and Fe 3+ ions onto sorbents as it lies in the range 2-4 (Tables S1-S3), indicating chemisorption as the main mechanism of sorption process [24,44]. The values of the mean free energy of sorption, E (kJ mol −1 ), evaluated taking into account the D-R isotherm constant (Equation (10), Supporting Information) of Cu 2+ , Zn 2+ , Ni 2+ , Fe 3+ , and Cr 3+ ions onto CPLH + sorbent (Table S1) were ranging from 12.5 to 15.15 kJ mol −1 , indicating a process which occurs by an ion exchange mechanism.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak at 553 cm −1 showed Fe-O bond from Fe 3 O 4 . The peak around 1400 cm -1 can be explained by symmetric vibration of COO-groups which indicates the carboxylate groups of GO coordination with the iron cations[21] .The magnetic properties of the Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles, GO and the M-GO nanocomposite were determined at room temperature. The hysteresis loop of magnetite, GO and M-GO composite are shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%