1990
DOI: 10.1029/jb095ib04p04373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic grain size and viscous remanent magnetization of pelagic clay

Abstract: Unfossiliferous pelagic clay (red clay) cores from the Pacific generally have unstable remanent magnetization except for tens of centimeters to several meters below the surface. The origin of this instability has been considered to be viscous remanent magnetization (VRM). We conducted a rock-magnetic study of a pelagic clay core from the South Pacific, which has the unstable-to-stable transition at about 1.5 m below the surface. Using the suspension method of Yoshida and Katsura (1985), we determined downcore … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their conclusions should be reconsidered since they did not correct for the paramagnetic contribution. Yamazaki and Katsura [ 1990] used X;FD to argue an increase in the magnetic grain size of pelagic clay in the South Pacific since the Pliocene. They also ignored the paramagnetic fraction; however, its influence is smaller because the ferrimagnetic component in the South Pacific pelagic clay is much larger than that of the North Pacific, and a linear relationship between X;L-X;H and X;L did not occur.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Magnetic Grain-size Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, their conclusions should be reconsidered since they did not correct for the paramagnetic contribution. Yamazaki and Katsura [ 1990] used X;FD to argue an increase in the magnetic grain size of pelagic clay in the South Pacific since the Pliocene. They also ignored the paramagnetic fraction; however, its influence is smaller because the ferrimagnetic component in the South Pacific pelagic clay is much larger than that of the North Pacific, and a linear relationship between X;L-X;H and X;L did not occur.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Magnetic Grain-size Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their core covered the entire Cenozoic, but age resolution was rather poor, partly because the sedimentation rate was low and their study was not focused on Pliocene-Pleistocene changes. Yamazaki and Katsura [ 1990] carried out a rockmagnetic study of a pelagic-clay core from the South Pacific and discussed the relation between magnetic grain size and the stability of the remanent magnetization. They suggested that magnetic grain size had increased since the Pliocene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of paleomagnetic instability at depths of a few metres below the seafloor has been reported widely for these sediments (e.g., Opdyke and Foster, 1970;Kent and Lowrie, 1974;Johnson et al, 1975;Henshaw and Merrill, 1980;Yamazaki and Katsura, 1990;Yamazaki and Ioka, 1997). The magnetic instability of pelagic red clays has been attributed to lowtemperature oxidation of stable SD magnetite, which is now known to be carried by magnetite magnetofossils (Yamazaki and Shimono, 2013), so that it forms smaller magnetically unstable SP maghemite particles (Kent and Lowrie, 1974;Johnson et al, 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Magnetic susceptibility profiles may be used to infer content of terrigenous materials in the sediments. The frequency dependencies were calculated from the differences of measured susceptibility values between the two modes, and those values suggest the grain-sizes of magnetic minerals (Yamazaki and Katsura, 1990): X FD is the frequency dependence, X L is the magnetic susceptibility of 0.47 kHz frequency and AΉ is the magnetic susceptibility of 4.7 kHz frequency Organic carbon contents were measured at 10-20 cm intervals. Samples were stored frozen before drying at 50°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%