Magnetic fusion energy quarterly report, January--March 1978

Abstract

Tim wpt.n *•» NOTICEn account "f wo.k jpiinwii-d by Hie I'mleu States ('" eminent. Ncitl ['mini States n i the United '• ales Depaitme HI .it I-nerff. nut an> ol then empl.i> ci. mil any n tlien tun it a clots, sub.. inlra<.liiis. in lit ii employees. nakei any warranty, c* prcii oi implied oi assuntts any legal liability ui rtspi. .nility loi tltca curacy.ftnnpte cnew or usefulness of ny inlormaturn. ppaiatus. pmd UCt 111 piOWlS JlK-IOiiJ or represents that its u« vmu il not infringe privately iwned DRhii. Low-Energy Timc-of-Flight Analyzer (A. I.. Hum) TMX Computer System (W.

Effect of electron beam injection on DCLC instabilities in mirror machines

“…It is interesting to note that the instability was enhanced over the no-beam fluctuation level, when the beam power was less than 42 kW. The success of this technique in suppressing the instability in Constance I prompted its trial in the 2XIIB device [6] in order to assess its potential of application to the end cells of MFTF-B and future tandom mirror devices. Klinkowstein and Smullin [3] have also suggested a mechanism for the observed suppression of the DCLC instability in Constance I.…”