2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81450-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic flux noise in superconducting qubits and the gap states continuum

Abstract: In the present study we investigate the selected local aspects of the metal-induced gap states (MIGSs) at the disordered metal–insulator interface, that were previously proposed to produce magnetic moments responsible for the magnetic flux noise in some of the superconducting qubit modalities. Our analysis attempts to supplement the available studies and provide new theoretical contribution toward their validation. In particular, we explicitly discuss the behavior of the MIGSs in the momentum space as a functi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In MMCs, 1/f noise scales with the amount of magnetic moments in the sensor material, suggesting that it originates from the paramagnetic, erbium-doped gold or silver sensor [14]. For SQUIDs, flux, and phase qubits, different models consider magnetic flux noise from the stochastic hopping of electrons [15], paramagnetic dangling bonds [16], strongly interacting surface spins [17,18], metal-induced gap states [19,20], or adsorbed O 2 molecules [21,22]. Both the experimental verification of theories and the reduction of noise in specific set-ups can be difficult, since devices usually suffer from a combination of different noise sources, which are hard to disentangle and therefore hard to eliminate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MMCs, 1/f noise scales with the amount of magnetic moments in the sensor material, suggesting that it originates from the paramagnetic, erbium-doped gold or silver sensor [14]. For SQUIDs, flux, and phase qubits, different models consider magnetic flux noise from the stochastic hopping of electrons [15], paramagnetic dangling bonds [16], strongly interacting surface spins [17,18], metal-induced gap states [19,20], or adsorbed O 2 molecules [21,22]. Both the experimental verification of theories and the reduction of noise in specific set-ups can be difficult, since devices usually suffer from a combination of different noise sources, which are hard to disentangle and therefore hard to eliminate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the architecture of a coupling junction at the constricted central line of a coplanar waveguide (CPW) is a practical choice to achieve ultrastrong coupling, while isolating the qubit from magnetic flux noise. References [19,20] report on the dependence of magnetic flux noise magnitude over the superconducting loop area. Furthermore, local effects in the superconducting material and substrate can produce magnetic flux noise [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%