2012
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ast.83.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Flux Leakage Sensing-Based Steel Cable NDE Technique Incorporated on a Cable Climbing Robot for Bridge Structures

Abstract: In this study, an automated cable monitoring system using a NDE technique and a cable climbing robot is proposed. MFL (Magnetic Flux Leakage- based inspection system was applied to monitor the condition of cables. This inspection system measures magnetic flux to detect the local faults (LF) of steel cable. To verify the feasibility of the proposed damage detection technique, an 8-channel MFL sensor head prototype was designed and fabricated. A steel cable bunch specimen with several types of damage was fabrica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated values of D 1 ðtÞ, D 2 ðtÞ, Δl 1 ðtÞ, and Δl 2 ðtÞ are shown in Table 3. The values of v 1 ðtÞ and v 2 ðtÞ are further calculated by substituting the values of D 1 ðtÞ, D 2 ðtÞ, Δl 1 ðtÞ, Δl 2 ðtÞ, Φ, Ψ, and PðtÞ into equation (19), as shown in Table 3. Finally, g 1 ðtÞ and g 2 ðtÞ are evaluated using equation ( 14), as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Finite Element Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simulated values of D 1 ðtÞ, D 2 ðtÞ, Δl 1 ðtÞ, and Δl 2 ðtÞ are shown in Table 3. The values of v 1 ðtÞ and v 2 ðtÞ are further calculated by substituting the values of D 1 ðtÞ, D 2 ðtÞ, Δl 1 ðtÞ, Δl 2 ðtÞ, Φ, Ψ, and PðtÞ into equation (19), as shown in Table 3. Finally, g 1 ðtÞ and g 2 ðtÞ are evaluated using equation ( 14), as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Finite Element Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the available techniques to evaluate cable damage mainly include vibration frequency technique, acoustic emission technique, magnetic flux leakage technique, fiber brag grating (FBG) technique, etc. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] For vibration frequency technique, it is commonly used in practice because of its simplicity and speediness. The frequency or cable force is calculated from the monitoring acceleration data of stay cables, and then the abnormal change of frequency or cable force is used for identification of cable damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For MFLM, in addition to its high cost, the determination of the relationship between magnetic properties and cable strain limits the application of this method . Besides, some technical problems such as temperature compensation of magnetic flux sensors, shielding effect of steel strands in the outer layers and sensor calibration are still not maturely solved, and one cable‐climbing device may be needed to climb along the long stay cable to detect the possible magnetic flux leakage . For FBGM, the FBJ sensors embedded in the stay cables are subjected to high stress levels, which are prone to failure due to their fragility, and moreover, the difficult accessibility and high cost for future replacement of damaged sensors is another disadvantage .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle of the magnetic flux leakage (MFL) detection is the change of the leakage magnetic field on the surface of wire ropes. Generally, wire ropes are magnetized by permanent magnets in the first stage then, magneto-dependent sensors, such as inducting coils or Hall sensors are used to detect the faults of wire ropes [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%