1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.44.10400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic-flux-lattice melting in a strong magnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
55
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
55
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts to use BP for calculation of melting also ran into problems. Hikami, Fujita and Larkin (Brézin et al, 1990;Hikami et al, 1991) tried to find the melting point by comparing the BP energy with the one loop solid energy and obtained a T = −7. However their one loop solid energy was incorrect (by factor √ 2) and in any case it was not precise enough, since the two loop contribution is essential.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to use BP for calculation of melting also ran into problems. Hikami, Fujita and Larkin (Brézin et al, 1990;Hikami et al, 1991) tried to find the melting point by comparing the BP energy with the one loop solid energy and obtained a T = −7. However their one loop solid energy was incorrect (by factor √ 2) and in any case it was not precise enough, since the two loop contribution is essential.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficients c n can be found in [25].The consecutive approximants are plotted on Fig.4 as dashed lines (T 1 to T 9, T 0 being equivalent to the Gaussian mean field). One clearly sees that the series are asymptotic and can be used only at a T > −2.…”
Section: Borel -Pade Methods Applied To the Lll Model Melting Linmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent attempts to use BP for the calculation of the melting line using longer series also ran into problems. Hikami, Fujita and Larkin [25] tried to find the melting point by comparing the BP energy with the one loop solid energy and obtained a T = −7. However their one loop solid energy was incorrect and, in any case, it was not precise enough (as will become clear below the two loop contribution cannot be neglected).…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Ideamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficients can be found in ref. [24,25]. We will denote g k (x) by the [k, k − 1] BP transform of g(x) (other BP approximants clearly violate the correct low temperature asymptotics).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%