2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4534(01)01232-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic flux in active and passive superconducting devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These systems rely essentially on either static arrays, such as pinning centers [2,3,4,5] and vortex-antivortex generators [6,7], or components influencing the vortex dynamics like channels [8,9,10,11] and ratchets [12,13]. The ultimate motivation behind the manipulation of the local vortex density is to enhance the performance of superconductor-based devices by reducing the noise in squid-based systems [14,15], gaining control on superconducting THz emitters [16] or even providing a way to predefine the optical transmission through the system [17].Unfortunately, for the majority of the components used in fluxonics devices, once they are created there is no margin for further modifications. In some cases this lack of flexibility becomes a limiting factor in the performance of the devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems rely essentially on either static arrays, such as pinning centers [2,3,4,5] and vortex-antivortex generators [6,7], or components influencing the vortex dynamics like channels [8,9,10,11] and ratchets [12,13]. The ultimate motivation behind the manipulation of the local vortex density is to enhance the performance of superconductor-based devices by reducing the noise in squid-based systems [14,15], gaining control on superconducting THz emitters [16] or even providing a way to predefine the optical transmission through the system [17].Unfortunately, for the majority of the components used in fluxonics devices, once they are created there is no margin for further modifications. In some cases this lack of flexibility becomes a limiting factor in the performance of the devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example the response of a coplanar [12,13] and a strip-line resonators [14,15], which are ones of mostly-used techniques for investigation of microwave response was calculated. The current distributions are J , OC 1 / J ( W 2 -x 2 ) ( a 2 -x 2 ) for coplanar resonator [12,13] ( W , a are the parameters of coplanar resonator) and J , oc 1 /JD for strip-line one [14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current distributions are J , OC 1 / J ( W 2 -x 2 ) ( a 2 -x 2 ) for coplanar resonator [12,13] ( W , a are the parameters of coplanar resonator) and J , oc 1 /JD for strip-line one [14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%