2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.167001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Fluctuations in Pair-Density-Wave Superconductors

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absence of a spin gap was also observed in the experiments on strongly underdoped LSCO [24] and LBCO [25], mentioned above. Both materials were suggested not to be d-wave superconductors but instead display Pair Density Wave (PDW) superconductivity [4,29]. Our results are consistent with this interpretation.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Absence of a spin gap was also observed in the experiments on strongly underdoped LSCO [24] and LBCO [25], mentioned above. Both materials were suggested not to be d-wave superconductors but instead display Pair Density Wave (PDW) superconductivity [4,29]. Our results are consistent with this interpretation.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…In underdoped LBCO, a lack of spin gap has also been observed and interpreted as evidence of a PDW type of electronic structure with intertwined modulated superconducting order and spin stripes [45,80]. In our sample, we interpret the absence of any significant decrease in χ for T < T c at energieshω 10 meV, as an indication that superconductivity in LCOO microscopically coexists with the low-energy magnetic fluctuations.…”
Section: -8supporting
confidence: 69%
“…To further elucidate the nature of the superconducting state, it would be interesting to investigate the presence or absence of a magnetic resonance peak by inelastic neutron measurements of high energy spin excitations. One of the fingerprints of the PDW is the absence of the magnetic resonance peak [45,80] otherwise observed, in standard d-wave SC, at E cross ≈ 40-50 meV [8,47,81].…”
Section: -8mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, both cuprate and iron-pnictide superconductors are proximal to magnetic and possibly "nematic" orders. In the case of the cuprates, the recent discovery of charge density order has ignited debate as to whether such thermodynamic phases are competing, causal, or benignly coincident with superconductivity [1][2][3]. This ground-state electronic competition is particularly important in quasi-one dimensional (q1D) systems [4,5], which generically show charge order and often also exhibit unconventional superconductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%