2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.035001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Fields with Precise Quasisymmetry for Plasma Confinement

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
199
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
199
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One single-stage optimization approach was demonstrated in Giuliani et al (2020), based on the near-axis expansion for quasi-symmetry in Garren & Boozer (1991); Landreman & Sengupta (2018); Landreman et al (2019); Landreman & Sengupta (2019). This approach was motivated by the fact that quasi-symmetric magnetic fields are known to have good confinement properties (Helander 2014;Landreman & Paul 2022). We demonstrated that this single-stage method effectively produced vacuum quasisymmetric magnetic fields in the vicinity of the magnetic axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…One single-stage optimization approach was demonstrated in Giuliani et al (2020), based on the near-axis expansion for quasi-symmetry in Garren & Boozer (1991); Landreman & Sengupta (2018); Landreman et al (2019); Landreman & Sengupta (2019). This approach was motivated by the fact that quasi-symmetric magnetic fields are known to have good confinement properties (Helander 2014;Landreman & Paul 2022). We demonstrated that this single-stage method effectively produced vacuum quasisymmetric magnetic fields in the vicinity of the magnetic axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We can test this criterion through a practical example. Take the magnetic axis from the QA design in [39] (the so-called precise QA) obtained directly from the VMEC files, and write the leading three harmonics: R {2,4,6} = {0.184, 0.0217, 0.00260} and Z {2,4,6} = {0.158, 0.0206, 0.00256}. First, we note that, as we hypothesized, R n ∼ Z n .…”
Section: Practical Application and Qualitative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Generally, we shall not need to deal with all the complex, intermediate phases, as strong shaping tends to make them impractical. Using the precise QH in [39] as a testbed, R {4,8,12,16} = {0.200, 0.0314, 0.00467, 0.000559} and Z {4,8,12,16} = {0.179, 0.0286, 0.00431, 0.000528}. The measure s is {3.4, 2.0, 0.7, 0.1}.…”
Section: Practical Application and Qualitative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, Matt Landreman at the University of Maryland, College Park, and Elizabeth Paul at Princeton University have given a boost to an alternative kind of fusion reactor called a stellarator. Using a numerical model, the researchers show that a particular magnetic-field arrangement, referred to as quasisymmetry, which allows long-term plasma confinement, can be achieved in a stellarator much more precisely than previously thought [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous numerical attempts to achieve quasisymmetry have mainly been based on minimizing the symmetry-breaking Fourier components of the scalar amplitude of the magnetic field in Boozer coordinates at each iteration. Landreman and Paul approach the problem by numerically minimizing an objective function that includes the toroidal and poloidal currents inside a magnetic surface [2]. Their result is a breakthrough because they find certain parameter combinations that achieve quasisymmetry more precisely than any previous efforts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%