2007
DOI: 10.1086/519160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Field Strength in the Solar Corona from Type II Band Splitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
56
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it would not significantly affect the height variation of B. On the other hand, since almost all of the direct (Lin et al 2000;Lin et al 2004) or indirect (Cho et al 2007;Ramesh et al 2010;West et al 2011) measurements of coronal fields strength in previous studies are mainly focused on the stronger fields above or at least emanate from major active regions, our results could offer helpful information about the magnetic field structures above mini active region newly-emerged in coronal hole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, it would not significantly affect the height variation of B. On the other hand, since almost all of the direct (Lin et al 2000;Lin et al 2004) or indirect (Cho et al 2007;Ramesh et al 2010;West et al 2011) measurements of coronal fields strength in previous studies are mainly focused on the stronger fields above or at least emanate from major active regions, our results could offer helpful information about the magnetic field structures above mini active region newly-emerged in coronal hole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There are still some disputes on the exact mechanisms responsible for the band-splitting (e.g., Treumann & Labelle 1992;Du et al 2015). The interpretation proposed by Smerd et al (1975) is preferred in many recent papers (Cho et al 2007a;Ma et al 2011;Gopalswamy et al 2012;Zimovets et al 2012). Vršnak et al (2002) proposed a method to obtain the compression ratio of the shock from the bandsplitting of a type II radio burst.…”
Section: Parameters Derived From Radio Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many recent works have suggested that the interaction region between CME shocks and streamers could possibly be an important source of both metric and interplanetary type IIs (e.g., Reiner et al 2003;Mancuso & Raymond 2004;Cho et al 2007Cho et al , 2008Feng et al 2012Feng et al , 2013Kong et al 2012Kong et al , 2015Shen et al 2013;Chen et al 2014;Magdalenić et al 2014;Eselevich et al 2015). Possible explanations for these results are twofold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%