2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014ja020419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic field power spectra and magnetic radial diffusion coefficients using CRRES magnetometer data

Abstract: We used the fluxgate magnetometer data from Combined Release and Radiation Effects Satellite (CRRES) to estimate the power spectral density (PSD) of the compressional component of the geomagnetic field in the ∼1 mHz to ∼8 mHz range. We conclude that magnetic wave power is generally higher in the noon sector for quiet times with no significant difference between the dawn, dusk, and the midnight sectors. However, during high Kp activity, the noon sector is not necessarily dominant anymore. The magnetic PSDs have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
71
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
12
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 in this article). This is confirmed by CRRES data (Ali et al, 2015): in the range of ∼ 1-8 mHz averaged spectra of the magnetic field fluctuations are very hard and almost flat.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8 in this article). This is confirmed by CRRES data (Ali et al, 2015): in the range of ∼ 1-8 mHz averaged spectra of the magnetic field fluctuations are very hard and almost flat.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The spectra of the fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in the range of ULF were also obtained from satellites (e.g., Lanzerotti et al, 1978;Holzworth and Mozer, 1979;Lanzerotti and Wolfe, 1980;Ali et al, 2015). The results of these estimates of D LL differ from each other by several orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other techniques to determine D L L include analysis of radial transport directly from radiation belt electron measurements assuming no other processes such as local heating intervene [ Selesnick et al , ]; calculation from electric field fluctuations [ Brautigam et al , ] and magnetic field fluctuations [ Ali et al , ] measured in situ; and a combination of ground magnetometer measurements of the transverse magnetic field components, which can be related to equatorial plane transverse electric field assuming a standing Alfven wave model and combined with in situ measurements of the compressional magnetic field fluctuations [ Ozeke et al , ]. In our study, the radial diffusion coefficient is calculated from LFM MHD simulations using the formula from Fei et al [], in which the diffusion coefficient is proportional to the integral of the fluctuating electric and magnetic field power that could resonate with the electron drift frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first comprehensive studies of ULF waves inward of the geostationary orbit were made using observations by the Active Magnetospheric Particle Tracer Explorers (AMPTE)/Charge Composition Explorer (CCE) at 5-8 R E (R E is the radius of the earth) (Anderson et al 1990;Anderson 1994). Ali et al (2015) investigated ULF waves observed by the Combined Release and Radiation Effects Satellite (CRRES) at L = 4-6.5 and evaluated the radial diffusion coefficient. The contribution of ULF waves to relativistic electron generation is still controversial; Su et al (2015) concluded that radial diffusion plays a key role, whereas a substantial number of studies support gyroresonant electron-whistler mode wave interaction as the predominant process (Miyoshi et al 2003;Horne et al 2005a, b;Shprits et al 2008;Reeves et al 2013 and references therein).…”
Section: Pc3-5 Ultra-low-frequency Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%