1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.79.495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic-Field–Induced Localization in the Normal State of SuperconductingLa2xSrxCuO

Abstract: Magnetoresistance measurements of highly underdoped superconducting La 2−x Sr x CuO 4 films with x = 0.051 and x = 0.048, performed in dc magnetic fields up to 20 T and at temperatures down to 40 mK, reveal a magnetic-field induced transition from weak to strong localization in the normal state. The normal-state conductances per CuO 2 -plane, measured at different fields in a single specimen, are found to collapse to one curve with the use of a single scaling parameter that is inversely proportional to the loc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field and temperature range used in our experiments, the magnetoresistivity is positive for all our films, in agreement with the results of [19,20,21]. Our data on thin films differ from the results of references [7,16] on single crystals of La 2-x Sr x -CuO 4 with x = 0.08 and x = 0.13, where the magnetoresistivity in the limit of high fields was found to be negative.…”
Section: La 18 Sr 02 Cuosupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In the field and temperature range used in our experiments, the magnetoresistivity is positive for all our films, in agreement with the results of [19,20,21]. Our data on thin films differ from the results of references [7,16] on single crystals of La 2-x Sr x -CuO 4 with x = 0.08 and x = 0.13, where the magnetoresistivity in the limit of high fields was found to be negative.…”
Section: La 18 Sr 02 Cuosupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The data are instead consistent (not shown) with the variable-range hopping (VRH), although the range of available fields is too small here to observe an orders-of-magnitude change in ρ that is characteristic of VRH. A larger change was observed in some early studies5,22 of the H-field induced localization in underdoped LSCO with a similar T c (H = 0), and attributed to a 2D or 3D Mott VRH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…If that is the case, the search for strong Anderson localization at any length of the multimode (N c ≥ 2) conducting strip has no sense even without any inelastic scattering mechanisms. Probably, it is necessary to invent some extra conditions to make the interferential localization possible in such conductors, e.g., magnetic field, 49 surface roughness, 50 etc.…”
Section: B the Weak Scattering Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the limit of L ≫ N c ℓ, it follows from (48b) that the zero-order approximation in ∆ Tn is, strictly speaking, insufficient for calculating the function G nn (x, x ′ ). Nevertheless, since the scattering rate 1/τ (T ) n can only be less than or of the order of the level width 1/τ (ϕ) n , the appropriate correction to the conductance can be reasonably estimated by substituting into g (1) (L) the function G nn (x, x ′ ) obtained from (49) to the first order in ∆ Tn . A simple but tedious calculation brings about the following estimation of the corresponding correction to the conductance:…”
Section: A the Diagonal Conductancementioning
confidence: 99%