1984
DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(84)90071-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic field inclination angle at geosynchronous orbit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The notation is as follows: N is the number of data points in the set; B is the r.m.s, external field; 2 is the r.m.s, residual field given by (A4); cl,c~, and c 3 are the coefficients defining the contribution from the intramagnetospheric current sheet and corresponding to three terms derived from potentials (50)-(52); arc is the scale radius of the ring current and 7Rc is a quantity defining its noon-midnight asymmetry; D is the nightside current sheet thickness (Tsyganenko, 1989a) One of the most surprising results concerns the characteristic half-thickness of the tail current sheet. Much more likely, the main contribution to this effect is made by a considerable decrease of the B:com- (Lin and Barfield, 1984) with those predicted by three models for different local times. As can be seen from Table I, the corresponding parameter D falls from D ~ 2.1 at Kp = 0, 0 + to D ~ 0.3 at Kp ~ 5 -.…”
Section: Table Imentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The notation is as follows: N is the number of data points in the set; B is the r.m.s, external field; 2 is the r.m.s, residual field given by (A4); cl,c~, and c 3 are the coefficients defining the contribution from the intramagnetospheric current sheet and corresponding to three terms derived from potentials (50)-(52); arc is the scale radius of the ring current and 7Rc is a quantity defining its noon-midnight asymmetry; D is the nightside current sheet thickness (Tsyganenko, 1989a) One of the most surprising results concerns the characteristic half-thickness of the tail current sheet. Much more likely, the main contribution to this effect is made by a considerable decrease of the B:com- (Lin and Barfield, 1984) with those predicted by three models for different local times. As can be seen from Table I, the corresponding parameter D falls from D ~ 2.1 at Kp = 0, 0 + to D ~ 0.3 at Kp ~ 5 -.…”
Section: Table Imentioning
confidence: 78%
“…A statistical analysis of the inclination angle I at the geosynchronous orbit has been done by using the satellite GOES 2 and 3 [Lin and Barfield, 1984]. They have shown that in 1200 ~ 1800 LT the magnetic field during disturbed condition (Kp=4~9) is distended and becomes tail-like configuration as compared with that during geomagnetically quiet condition (Kp=4~9).…”
Section: Occurrence Of the Compressional Pc 5 Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of the geomagnetic field and plasma in this region is extremely variable because the region lies at the boundary between the "spheres of influence" of the Earth's internal currents and the magnetotail currents. It has been remarked for many years [Sugiura, 1972;Hedgecock and Thomas, 1975;Lin and Barfield, 1984;Kaufmann, 1987;Fairfield et al, 1987;Pulkkinen et al, 1991] that taillike fields can often be observed at synchronous orbit, implying that an intense thin current sheet can approach close to Earth, (possibly reaching earthward of geosynchronous orbit). Thus, while tracing field lines is fully recognized as a matter of general importance in magnetospheric research, it is particularly important in the regions of synchronous orbit and the auroral zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%