2014
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic endoscopic imaging as an adjuvant to elective colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: Adjuvant MEI is associated with a lower failure risk and shorter time to cecal intubation during elective colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magnetic endoscope imaging is an established useful adjunct for assisting with loop identification and reduction during colonoscopy, and for reducing patient discomfort in unsedated or minimally sedated colonoscopy 16 17 18 19 , although it is less useful for reducing cecal intubation time 20. However, the role of magnetic endoscope imaging as an adjunctive tool for colonoscopic lesion localization has not be well studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic endoscope imaging is an established useful adjunct for assisting with loop identification and reduction during colonoscopy, and for reducing patient discomfort in unsedated or minimally sedated colonoscopy 16 17 18 19 , although it is less useful for reducing cecal intubation time 20. However, the role of magnetic endoscope imaging as an adjunctive tool for colonoscopic lesion localization has not be well studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis of all RCTs. which included a total of 4470 patients, found that MEI was associated with a significantly lower risk of failed caecal intubation (a risk difference of 4%, 95 %CI 0 % -7 %; P = 0.03), lower caecal intubation times (mean difference of 0.58 minutes, 95 %CI 0.28 -0.88; P < 0.001) and lower pain scores as estimated by visual analogue scale (mean difference 0.45 cm, 95 %CI 0.03-0.86; P = 0.03) compared with conventional colonoscopy [10]. However, there was considerable heterogeneity amongst the trials and it is arguable whether such difference in caecal intubation times and pain scores are clinically significant.…”
Section: Mei Use In Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Other techniques include cap‐assisted colonoscopy (CAC), x‐ray imaging and magnetic endoscopic imaging (MEI), which may be useful especially for inexperienced endoscopists. CAC keeps mucosa away from the lens, maximizing visualization, and allowing for anticipation of sharp turns, leading to less looping, while x‐ray and MEI may be useful to identify difficult anatomy, recognize and overcome loops, and apply specific abdominal pressure in the appropriate location . While fluoroscopy is two‐dimensional, MEI provides three‐dimensional endoscopic configuration and is radiation free; however, none of these techniques is available in most endoscopic departments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAC keeps mucosa away from the lens, maximizing visualization, and allowing for anticipation of sharp turns, leading to less looping, 19 while x-ray and MEI may be useful to identify difficult anatomy, recognize and overcome loops, and apply specific abdominal pressure in the appropriate location. 20 While fluoroscopy is two-dimensional, MEI provides threedimensional endoscopic configuration and is radiation free; however, none of these techniques is available in most endoscopic departments. They may be useful teaching tools for colonoscopy, especially whenever difficulties arise with intubation.…”
Section: A Natomically Difficult Colonoscopiesmentioning
confidence: 99%