2006
DOI: 10.1134/s0031918x0605005x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic domains in martensite of the Ni-Mn-Ga alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the MT the character of magnetic anisotropy typically changes from cubic (austenite) to a uniaxial (martensite) one and this manifests itself in an abrupt magnetic susceptibility (χ ) decrease. For different martensitic materials the observations of such jumps on temperature dependences of the magnetic susceptibility have been reported in numerous papers [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Qualitatively, the susceptibility decreases due to a sharp increase of the anisotropy constant at the transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At the MT the character of magnetic anisotropy typically changes from cubic (austenite) to a uniaxial (martensite) one and this manifests itself in an abrupt magnetic susceptibility (χ ) decrease. For different martensitic materials the observations of such jumps on temperature dependences of the magnetic susceptibility have been reported in numerous papers [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Qualitatively, the susceptibility decreases due to a sharp increase of the anisotropy constant at the transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is well known that low-field quasistatic (low frequency) magnetic susceptibility is caused by domain walls' displacements under an applied ac magnetic field. In general, the susceptibility is strongly affected by magnetic domain wall (DW) pinning by different types of sample defects: grains [30], twin and antiphase boundaries [11,23,31,32], nano/microinclusions [30,33] and atomic lattice defects [34]. The strongest pinning, and therefore the smallest susceptibility, are caused by defects whose mean size is comparable with the domain wall width [30,33,35,36].…”
Section: Temperature Dependences Of the Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations