2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.61.6871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic domain reversal in ultrathin Co(001) films probed by giant magnetoresistance measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An extra reason for working with Co layers with thickness in the range of 30-50 nm comes from the fact that changes in the magnetic anisotropy of shape origin should be fully effective here; for very thin films (below 30 nm), an in-plane magnetic anisotropy dominates, while for sufficiently thick films (above 50 nm) an out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy is established. [23][24][25] Unfortunately, the requisite of using Co thickness in the range of tens of nanometers meets a strong conflict originating from the morphology of the PE crystals employed here; the as-prepared PMN-PT single crystals have a mean surface roughness in the range of many hundred nanometers as this is evidenced by detailed AFM data (see below). Thus, Co outer layers with thickness of only a few tens of nanometers would probably be ineffective electrodes for voltage delivery since their comparatively small thickness (in respect to the PMN-PT surface roughness) cannot ensure the homogeneous covering of the PMN-PT crystal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An extra reason for working with Co layers with thickness in the range of 30-50 nm comes from the fact that changes in the magnetic anisotropy of shape origin should be fully effective here; for very thin films (below 30 nm), an in-plane magnetic anisotropy dominates, while for sufficiently thick films (above 50 nm) an out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy is established. [23][24][25] Unfortunately, the requisite of using Co thickness in the range of tens of nanometers meets a strong conflict originating from the morphology of the PE crystals employed here; the as-prepared PMN-PT single crystals have a mean surface roughness in the range of many hundred nanometers as this is evidenced by detailed AFM data (see below). Thus, Co outer layers with thickness of only a few tens of nanometers would probably be ineffective electrodes for voltage delivery since their comparatively small thickness (in respect to the PMN-PT surface roughness) cannot ensure the homogeneous covering of the PMN-PT crystal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Referring to the coercive field H c , we believe that the observed modulation is motivated by two candidate mechanisms: (a) by the pinning of already existing domain walls that can be effectively enhanced either by the surface/interface roughness or "bulk" static disorder that are newly introduced by the developed strain 26-29 and (b) by the modulation of domain walls population that inevitably should accompany the modulation of magnetic domain size due to the deformation of the FM film thickness motivated by the induced strain (the magnetic domain size w is proportional to the square root of the film thickness d, that is w $ d 1/2 ). [23][24][25] Referring to the saturation magnetization m sat , we believe that the observed modulation can be motivated by the change of the magnetic anisotropy due to the change of the shape anisotropy either at the local or global level. For Co it is well known that, except for the magnetocrystalline anisotropy, another mechanism of magnetic anisotropy stems from the dimensional restrictions due to the reduction of the layer thickness (shape anisotropy).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these experiments a TMR signal with rich structure was observed, that was attributed to the details of the underlying magnetization reversal mechanism. Spin-dependent transport measurements have been previously used as an indirect probe of the micromagnetic structure in spin-valves 16 , magnetic tunnel junctions 17 , artificial ferromagnetic layers 18 , and ferromagnetic rings 19 . The basic idea behind these experiments is that the spin-dependent scattering mechanism leads to a resistivity proportional to the (average) relative orientation of the magnetic moments of separated magnetic regions (either nanoparticles or magnetic domains with different magnetization orientation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many investigations have focused on the orientationdependent magnetization reversal process of ultrathin epitaxial Fe films, such studies in the Cu/Co system have yet received little attention, despite the Cu/Co system having been investigated intensively [8][9][10][11][12][13]. In this work, we investigate the orientation-dependent magnetization reversal in epitaxial FCC Co(0 0 1) films using the effect of the giant magnetoresistance, which method has been widely used to probe the domain reversal processes [14,15].Molecular beam epitaxy techniques were used to grow epitaxial samples in this work. During the growth, in situ reflection high electron diffraction measurements were carried out to confirm epitaxial growth of the FCC-Co films.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%