2017
DOI: 10.1002/tee.22575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic disturbance field compensation of a geomagnetic vector measuring instrument

Abstract: Magnetic disturbance field from ferromagnetic structural parts is a dominant factor that influences the accuracy of a geomagnetic vector measuring instrument. In this paper, a new vector compensation method for a three-axis magnetometer is proposed. In the first step, combined with posture information from inertial sensors, the dataset of the three-axis magnetometer outputs in different postures is utilized to construct linear equations of the error parameters; then the soft-iron parameters are determined with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, for practical applications it is relatively feasible to adopt the algorithm-based means that concentrates on algebraic ellipsoid fitting and magnetic coefficient estimates. Since the direct solutions involve complex coupling consequences, the preferred solution therefore, is intended to underpin progressive estimation in many domains such as simplifying the calculating iteration, eliminating the mutual coupling effects, and reducing the computational work [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. As a typical instance, D. Gebre-egziabher [ 12 ] proposed a nonlinear estimation algorithm to calibrate the solid-state strapdown magnetometers, first putting forward a two-step model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for practical applications it is relatively feasible to adopt the algorithm-based means that concentrates on algebraic ellipsoid fitting and magnetic coefficient estimates. Since the direct solutions involve complex coupling consequences, the preferred solution therefore, is intended to underpin progressive estimation in many domains such as simplifying the calculating iteration, eliminating the mutual coupling effects, and reducing the computational work [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. As a typical instance, D. Gebre-egziabher [ 12 ] proposed a nonlinear estimation algorithm to calibrate the solid-state strapdown magnetometers, first putting forward a two-step model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%