2002
DOI: 10.1109/20.996303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic discretion of naval propulsion machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is based on a 3-D finite element modeling coupled with a post-processing based on a volume integral equation. This approach was successfully validated by experimental measurements [3].…”
Section: Forward Modelingmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It is based on a 3-D finite element modeling coupled with a post-processing based on a volume integral equation. This approach was successfully validated by experimental measurements [3].…”
Section: Forward Modelingmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The method has already shown good results in shielding effects computation or magnetic signature of ferromagnetic hulls. A combination of FEM and moment method can lead also to interesting results [13]. This method seems easier to implement than the use of infinite modeling tools in FEM or coupling with BEM.…”
Section: A Stray Field Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us remember that the magnetic field (and so the force) is calculated thanks to equivalent charge distribution. In fact, charges are a representation of the flux [see (13)]. A good way to apply moment method is to imagine where these charges are going to have the highest variation and then to refine the mesh in this area and not elsewhere.…”
Section: A Modeling Of An Actuatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accurate formulation to compute the stray field has been proposed (Froidurot et al, 2002). It is based on a standard FEM computation with infinite box and then a post-processing with magnetic moments method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%