2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic detection of corroded steel rebar: Reality and simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The electromagnetic methods may be used to localize rebars in the structure, precisely estimate basic structure parameters (such as the thickness of the concrete cover, the rebar’s diameter, the rebars class [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], and detect corrosion or other flaws [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]). The most significant advantages of the methods from this group are the direct impact on reinforcement, the low damping of electromagnetic waves by concrete and the high spectrum of frequencies that can be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The electromagnetic methods may be used to localize rebars in the structure, precisely estimate basic structure parameters (such as the thickness of the concrete cover, the rebar’s diameter, the rebars class [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], and detect corrosion or other flaws [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]). The most significant advantages of the methods from this group are the direct impact on reinforcement, the low damping of electromagnetic waves by concrete and the high spectrum of frequencies that can be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the typical excitation frequency range is from 0.5 to 10 kHz (for reinforced concrete structures). The eddy current method can be used not only to detect the presence of rebars but also to determine the thickness of the concrete cover, the rebar’s diameter, the alloy of reinforcing bars (due to different electrical properties), or even to detect corrosion of rebars [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. The effective range of the eddy current method is from 0 to about 100 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on magnetic flux leakage detection, researchers have carried out important research on the magnetic properties of rebar in RC structures and obtained several research results [15,16]. The self-magnetic flux leakage (SMFL) technology [17] is based on the magnetic memory property of metals to collect the magnetic leakage intensity emitted by ferromagnetic materials at the rust damage, diagnose the presence of rust damage, and locate the location of the disease by detecting and analyzing the intensity of the magnetic leakage field on the surface of ferromagnetic components and its change characteristics [18]. The technology does not require additional external magnetic field excitation and pretreatment of the surface of the component to be tested, and can directly detect the rust loss defects of the component to be tested, which is convenient, sensitive, and does not cause environmental pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postconcreting inspections are based on ground penetrating radar (GPR), 6 electromagnetism, 7 thermography, 8 and ultrasonic waves. 9 The information captured by these common methods can be represented as images that can be analyzed directly using machine learning classification, 10 multi-scale Harris corner detection algorithm, 11 selfmagnetic behavior simulation, 12 numerical modeling, 8 and artificial neural network. 9 These methods are considered technological innovations; nevertheless, they suffer from Discussion on this paper must be submitted within two months of the print publication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%