2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2018.2874169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Calibration System With Interference Compensation

Abstract: The article describes a novel method for calibrating dc-precise magnetometers in the low field range (± 100 μT), which gives acceptable results even in laboratory conditions with significant magnetic interference. By introducing a closely mounted reference magnetometer and a specific calibration procedure, it is possible to compensate for the external magnetic field disturbances caused e.g. by local transportation operated with dc power supplies. The field compensation occurs only shortly after the calibrating… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2019, Ali et al proposed a sensor error correction method using a uniaxial Helmholtz coil and combining least squares with BP neural networks.The uniaxial Helmholtz coil is used to generate a reference magnetic field, the errors such as accuracy and nonorthogonality of the sensor are corrected, and the effect of noise on the measurement results is compensated [10]. In the same year, Janosek et al proposed a calibration method for DC precision magnetic sensors with interference compensation in a weak magnetic environment, which improved the environmental adaptability of the sensors and achieved good calibration results in a laboratory environment with significant magnetic interference [11]. In 2020, Pan et al proposed a method to correct sensor errors using a magnetically shielded chamber and a triaxial Helmholtz coil, which was achieved by modeling sensor errors as well as environmental noise, using a magnetically shielded chamber to provide a near-zero magnetic environment, and using a triaxial coil to provide a controlled vector magnetic field [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2019, Ali et al proposed a sensor error correction method using a uniaxial Helmholtz coil and combining least squares with BP neural networks.The uniaxial Helmholtz coil is used to generate a reference magnetic field, the errors such as accuracy and nonorthogonality of the sensor are corrected, and the effect of noise on the measurement results is compensated [10]. In the same year, Janosek et al proposed a calibration method for DC precision magnetic sensors with interference compensation in a weak magnetic environment, which improved the environmental adaptability of the sensors and achieved good calibration results in a laboratory environment with significant magnetic interference [11]. In 2020, Pan et al proposed a method to correct sensor errors using a magnetically shielded chamber and a triaxial Helmholtz coil, which was achieved by modeling sensor errors as well as environmental noise, using a magnetically shielded chamber to provide a near-zero magnetic environment, and using a triaxial coil to provide a controlled vector magnetic field [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the application of the magnetometers as the attitude sensors, many calibration and estimation algorithms have been proposed to improve the accuracy of the magnetometers [15], [16], [17]. However, in order to estimate the attitude of ammunition, the real-time capability of the calculation and the time variability of the error must be fully considered, and the calculation cost should be as low as possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%