2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic behavior of electrodeposited cobalt nanowires using different electrolytic bath acidities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the micrometric fibers, the ZFC curve (Figure ) rapidly increases with temperature below 6 K and linearly between 17 and 380 K, which can be attributed to different mechanisms of magnetic alignment. The well-pronounced peak around 6 K can be ascribed to some small Co particles with a volume distribution whose blocking temperatures are around 6 K. From this measured T B , it is possible to estimate the particles’ size using the relation K a V = 25 k B T B where K B is the boltzman constant, and K a V is the anisotropy energy barrier . Thus, the upper volume of these small particles can be estimated at 1.7 nm using an anisotropy constant of 4.1 × 10 5 J m −3 , calculated for Co nanotubes with R = 90 nm and H = 60 μm .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the micrometric fibers, the ZFC curve (Figure ) rapidly increases with temperature below 6 K and linearly between 17 and 380 K, which can be attributed to different mechanisms of magnetic alignment. The well-pronounced peak around 6 K can be ascribed to some small Co particles with a volume distribution whose blocking temperatures are around 6 K. From this measured T B , it is possible to estimate the particles’ size using the relation K a V = 25 k B T B where K B is the boltzman constant, and K a V is the anisotropy energy barrier . Thus, the upper volume of these small particles can be estimated at 1.7 nm using an anisotropy constant of 4.1 × 10 5 J m −3 , calculated for Co nanotubes with R = 90 nm and H = 60 μm .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-pronounced peak around 6 K can be ascribed to some small Co particles with a volume distribution whose blocking temperatures are around 6 K. From this measured T B , it is possible to estimate the particles' size using the relation K a V ) 25k B T B where K B is the boltzman constant, and K a V is the anisotropy energy barrier. 29 Thus, the upper volume of these small particles can be estimated at 1.7 nm using an anisotropy constant of 4.1 × 10 5 J m -3 , calculated for Co nanotubes with R ) 90 nm and H ) 60 µm. 30 This result is consistent with the aggregation process proposed to explain the growth mechanism of these micrometric fibers.…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Of Cobalt Fibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At room temperature, the magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant of bulk hcp cobalt was determined to be K 1 = 5.0 × 10 6 erg/cm 3 , while the shape anisotropy of magnetic nanowires was reported to be K s = π M 2 s = 6.10 6 erg/cm 3 [21]. From both the basic and applied research perspectives, a clear understanding of the effects of synthesis parameters (e.g., deposition current and time, pH solution) [22,23,24,25,26,27] and morphology (e.g., wire length and diameter) [6,9,28,29] on the magnetic properties of ordered nanowire arrays is essential. Despite some previous efforts [16,17], effects of the wire diameter on the magnetic properties of the ordered CoNiP nanowire arrays remained to be investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Consequently, it has recently become a popular trend to try to control the orientation of hcp c axis ͑i.e., easy axis of the magnetocrystal anisotropy͒ and, hence, the effective anisotropy in Co NWs, for example, by applying a magnetic field during electrodeposition or by modifying the above-mentioned deposition parameters. 6,[10][11][12] In this study, we synthesized ordered and high density ͑10 10 / cm 2 ͒ Co NW arrays utilizing freestanding AAO templates and direct-current ͑dc͒ electrodeposition and investigated their magnetic properties as functions of NW aspect ratio ͑͒ and packing factor ͑or template porosity͒ by analyzing room temperature magnetization curves. ͑We note, however, that no special attention was paid to engineer the crystal structure/texture.͒ It is found that array magnetic properties are determined to a great extent by the magnetostatic interactions between array elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%