Rob | Arch 2012 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1465-0_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A negotiation between digital design and digital craftsmanship that requires dynamic blueprints rather than static ones. "Dynamic Blueprints (Dubor and Diaz 2013)" offers a new tool for the designer to negotiate the materialisation of the project, where uncertainty, inaccuracy and unpredictability coming from the material and the fabrication process could be integrated in the design within predefined boundaries and logics, in accordance with the overall design goals.…”
Section: Dynamic Blueprints and Cyber Physical Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A negotiation between digital design and digital craftsmanship that requires dynamic blueprints rather than static ones. "Dynamic Blueprints (Dubor and Diaz 2013)" offers a new tool for the designer to negotiate the materialisation of the project, where uncertainty, inaccuracy and unpredictability coming from the material and the fabrication process could be integrated in the design within predefined boundaries and logics, in accordance with the overall design goals.…”
Section: Dynamic Blueprints and Cyber Physical Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially the majority of architectural robotic research utilizing computer vision has revolved around its application at the micro scale, using vision feedback systems to make incremental adjustments to a robotic strategy based upon local variations [15,16]. While beneficial as a means to adjust for material variation and machine error, these implementations are not robust enough for the in-situ robotics due to the complexities of construction sites.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%