2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.144403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic anisotropy of embedded Co nanoparticles: Influence of the surrounding matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also assume that the particles are far enough from each other so that they are not interacting (this corresponds to diluted samples of clusters embedded in a matrix, as those of Refs. [18][19][20]). The easy magnetization axes are supposed to be randomly oriented, as is the case in most experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We also assume that the particles are far enough from each other so that they are not interacting (this corresponds to diluted samples of clusters embedded in a matrix, as those of Refs. [18][19][20]). The easy magnetization axes are supposed to be randomly oriented, as is the case in most experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…3). One possible explanation could be the presence of a magnetic dead layer at the surface of these nanocrystallites that would decrease their magnetization [29], and in this case reduces it to zero, considering the small amount of these crystallized particles. Another one could be the reduction of exchange-coupling between adjacent nanoparticles through the increasingly paramagnetic amorphous matrix when the sample's temperature is higher than the Curie temperature T C of the amorphous matrix, as suggested by Hernando and Kulik [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…13 The magnetic anisotropy constant for 25-nm Ni nanoparticles in our Si sample is estimated to be at least on the order of $1.6 Â 10 4 J/m 3 , about three times the anisotropy constant in bulk Ni material, 32 implying that the interface between Ni particles and their Si surroundings may play a key role in magnetic switching of embedded Ni particles. 33 Alternatively, magnetoelastic anisotropy due to strains around magnetic nanoparticles may not be ignored. 34,35 In addition to enhanced surface/interface anisotropy, the inter-particle interactions may be partially responsible for the persistence of hysteretic behavior for Ni nanoparticles at room temperature.…”
Section: Implications On Magnetic Anisotropy and Particle Interactmentioning
confidence: 99%