2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic anisotropy — How much is enough for a permanent magnet?

Abstract: Material choices for permanent magnets are analyzed in terms of energy product, anisotropy and hardness parameter. Energy product is the main consideration for permanent magnets, because the purpose of a magnet is to store magnetostatic energy and create as much flux as possible in the surrounding space. Magnet processing is easiest if the hardness parameter is significantly greater than one. The anisotropy requirement becomes increasingly stringent for large M s and K 1 values of 1 to 2 MJ/m 3 may be insuffic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
82
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.4 Toward an increase in the coercivity of α"-Fe16N2 nanoparticle assemblies The empirical figure known as the magnetic hardness parameter = (K1/μ0Ms 2 ) 1/2 is a useful parameter to consider how to approach the construction of modern permanent magnet 15) . The  value for Nd2Fe14B as a typical modern magnet, is 1.54, while that for α"-Fe16N2 is 0.53.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.4 Toward an increase in the coercivity of α"-Fe16N2 nanoparticle assemblies The empirical figure known as the magnetic hardness parameter = (K1/μ0Ms 2 ) 1/2 is a useful parameter to consider how to approach the construction of modern permanent magnet 15) . The  value for Nd2Fe14B as a typical modern magnet, is 1.54, while that for α"-Fe16N2 is 0.53.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This surface charge distribution is a source of magnetic field and it is known as the demagnetizing field since it acts in opposition to the magnetic field which produces it [19]. The unique feature of permanent magnets is their ability to store magnetostatic energy and their shapes were dictated by the low coercivity H c of the ferromagnetic materials available over a 100 years ago, which limited the tolerable demagnetizing field in the second quadrant of the M(H) hysteresis loop where the working point of a magnet is inevitably located [20].…”
Section: Shape Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shape anisotropy is only fully effective in regions where the magnetization remains uniform and rotates coherently without breaking upinto domains [20].…”
Section: Shape Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] The main concern in the material choice is the energy product, which quantifies the ability of the magnet to store magnetostatic energy and create flux in the surrounding space. 4 Improving extrinsic and intrinsic properties by nanostructuring and atomic structuring (crystal structure, composition) is the way to maximize the energy product. 5 The maximum possible value (BH) MAX = 1 /4 µ 0 M 2 s is reached with a demagnetization factor N = 1 /2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this H c must be greater than M s /2 where M s is related to the intrinsic atomic and crystal structure and H c originates from the magnetic anisotropy K. Typically its value will not exceed 25% of the anisotropy field H a = 2K/µ 0 M s . 4,6 Furthermore, H c depends on grain size, microscopic defects and the thermal history of a sample. Usually it is inversely related to the grain size, and large coerciviy is obtained when the crystallites are small and single-domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%