2011
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2011.2158410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic and Microwave Absorption Properties of Core/Shell FeCo-Based Nanocomposites Synthesized by a Simple Wet Chemical Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This stems from three main drawbacks of this method, (i) the shell is always derived from the core, consequently their sizes cannot be independently controlled (ii) since the shell phase has to be derived from a surface treatment of the core material, the possible choices of core/shell phases are somewhat limited; (iii) since the materials in the core and the shell often have quite different structural characteristics (e.g., metal vs. oxide), the structural quality of the shell may be inferior. Despite these disadvantages, several examples of this approach using surface oxidation, mainly for inverse soft/hard systems, can be found in the literature: FeCo/CoFe 2 O 4 [120,121], FeCoB/CoFe 2 O 4 [123] and FeCo(Al)/FeCo(Al)O x [124]. Concerning controlled reduction, only the CoFe 2 O 4 /FeCo system has been studied, although two different reduction approaches have been used hydrogen reduction [125][126][127][128][129] and carbon reduction [130].…”
Section: Synthesis Of Hard-soft Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This stems from three main drawbacks of this method, (i) the shell is always derived from the core, consequently their sizes cannot be independently controlled (ii) since the shell phase has to be derived from a surface treatment of the core material, the possible choices of core/shell phases are somewhat limited; (iii) since the materials in the core and the shell often have quite different structural characteristics (e.g., metal vs. oxide), the structural quality of the shell may be inferior. Despite these disadvantages, several examples of this approach using surface oxidation, mainly for inverse soft/hard systems, can be found in the literature: FeCo/CoFe 2 O 4 [120,121], FeCoB/CoFe 2 O 4 [123] and FeCo(Al)/FeCo(Al)O x [124]. Concerning controlled reduction, only the CoFe 2 O 4 /FeCo system has been studied, although two different reduction approaches have been used hydrogen reduction [125][126][127][128][129] and carbon reduction [130].…”
Section: Synthesis Of Hard-soft Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning controlled reduction, only the CoFe 2 O 4 /FeCo system has been studied, although two different reduction approaches have been used hydrogen reduction [125][126][127][128][129] and carbon reduction [130]. Interestingly, previous to surface treatment the nanoparticles were synthesized mainly by wet chemistry methods such as: thermal decomposition [122], metal reduction [123], sol-gel [129] or co-precipitation [126]. However, some physical approaches have been also reported to obtain the initial nanoparticles such as: inert gas condensation [120], thermal plasma method [124], flame spray pyrolysis [121] and ionic coordination [125][126][127][128].…”
Section: Synthesis Of Hard-soft Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations