1986
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2541(86)90012-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic and chemical characterisation of a diagenetic magnetic mineral formed in the sediments of productive lakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In clastic-dominated sediment systems such as Lake Elsinore, the amount of magnetic material is a function largely of the flux of allochthonous sediment into the lake's basin. There are, however, other factors that can affect sediment magnetic susceptibility such as post-depositional diagenesis (Hilton , 1985;Hilton et al, 1986), dilution from organic matter and/or carbonates, and mineral segregation by wave action (Smoot and Benson, 2004). Because both cores LESS02-8 and -10 were collected from near the modern shore position, it is expected that the sediments are influenced strongly by wave action and similar nearshore current processes throughout similar lake stands (Fig.…”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clastic-dominated sediment systems such as Lake Elsinore, the amount of magnetic material is a function largely of the flux of allochthonous sediment into the lake's basin. There are, however, other factors that can affect sediment magnetic susceptibility such as post-depositional diagenesis (Hilton , 1985;Hilton et al, 1986), dilution from organic matter and/or carbonates, and mineral segregation by wave action (Smoot and Benson, 2004). Because both cores LESS02-8 and -10 were collected from near the modern shore position, it is expected that the sediments are influenced strongly by wave action and similar nearshore current processes throughout similar lake stands (Fig.…”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular geochemical conditions are required for the preservation of ferrimagnetic sulfide phases [Westrich and Berner, 1984;Canfield and Berner, 1987], however, greigite has increasingly been recognized as an important remanence carrier in sediments deposited under sulfate-reducing conditions, largely as a result of more frequent application of mineral magnetic (thermomagnetic and SIRM/z) and geochemical (X ray diffraction) techniques in paleomagnetic studies. Hilton et al [1986] proposed an authigenic/diagenetic origin for a potentially large part of the mineral magnetic content of organic sediments from productive lakes, however, the significance of authigenic magnetic phases in marine environ-menCs is underestimated in the model of Hilton [ 1987]. This is particularly the case because greigite has been so widely identified in marine sediments [e.g., Tric et al, 1991;Horng et al, 1992;Roberts and Turner, 1993;Reynolds et al, 1994].…”
Section: Authigenic/diagenetic Formation Of Ferrimagnetic Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such results, interpreted in the light of the work of Hilton and Lishman (1985), Hilton et al (1986), Hilton (1990) and Snowball and Thompson (1988) would suggest that greigite formed a significant proportion of the magnetic minerals in the sediments. However, apart from a section from 480 to 610 cm in core ST77, where good correlations are observed between both original IRM and loss of IRM, and Mn (r= 0.684 and 0.694 respectively), no correlation was found between loss of magnetic remanence and variations in the factors often associated with the occurrence of greigite, such as sulphur or carbon con-181 centration (Hilton, 1986). On the contrary, in the upper part of the core, IRM3o0mv values (irrespective of whether the original, remeasured, or 'lost-during-storage' values were used) all correlate well (r = 0.74 to 0.93) with Mackereth's (1966) erosion indicators such as Na, K and Mg (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…and Hilton et al (1986) demonstrated that the magnetic susceptibility of samples of late Holocene sediments from several English Lake District lakes declined during storage and slow oxidation from the initial fresh, wet state. Subsequently, Snowball & Thompson (1988) and Hilton (1990)have shown that greigite (Fe3S4), an authigenic iron sulphide, is present in some of the sediments associated with this loss of susceptibility and with a loss of isothermal and anhysteretic remanence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%