2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12050.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic acceleration of relativistic active galactic nucleus jets

Abstract: We present numerical simulations of axisymmetric, magnetically driven relativistic jets. Our special‐relativistic, ideal‐magnetohydrodynamics numerical scheme is specifically designed to optimize accuracy and resolution and to minimize numerical dissipation. In addition, we implement a grid‐extension method that reduces the computation time by up to three orders of magnitude and makes it possible to follow the flow up to six decades in spatial scale. To eliminate the dissipative effects induced by a free bound… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
424
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 421 publications
(462 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
34
424
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption results to a pure toroidal magnetic field distribution in the jet, while a polodial magnetic distribution is adopted in an inhomogeneous jet model for the rapid variability of TeV blazars (Boutelier et al 2008). We note that a domi- nant toroidal magnetic field in jet are predicted by theory (Lyutikov et al 2005) and magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations (McKinney 2006;Komissarov et al 2007), and are also supported by a parsec-scale polarization observation (O'Sullivan & Gabuzda 2009;Kharb et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This assumption results to a pure toroidal magnetic field distribution in the jet, while a polodial magnetic distribution is adopted in an inhomogeneous jet model for the rapid variability of TeV blazars (Boutelier et al 2008). We note that a domi- nant toroidal magnetic field in jet are predicted by theory (Lyutikov et al 2005) and magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations (McKinney 2006;Komissarov et al 2007), and are also supported by a parsec-scale polarization observation (O'Sullivan & Gabuzda 2009;Kharb et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The jet power, originally carried by an almost pure electromagnetic beam (with magnetization parameter σ ≡ PB/P kin ≫ 1), is progressively used to accelerate matter, until a substantial equipartition between the magnetic and the kinetic energy fluxes (σ ≈ 1) is established (e.g., Komissarov et al 2007, Tchekhovskoy et al 2009, Vlahakis 2015. Dissipation of part of the kinetic (through shocks) and/or magnetic (through reconnection) power leads to the acceleration of particles up to ultra-relativistic energies, producing the nonthermal emission we observe from the jets of blazars, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the minimal cross-sectional radius of a jet to be R ∼ 10 15 cm, which for θ j ∼ 1/Γ corresponds with a distance 100 gravitational radii of the 10 9 M BH -required to be at least of this order to accelerate the jet up to Γ ∼ 10 ( Komissarov et al 2007) -we can find using Eqs. (3.10) and (3.11) that (4.4) This indicates that even for such extreme parameters as f ∼ 1 and σ ∼ 1 the efficiency is too small to explain γ-ray luminosities L γ ∼ 10 44 erg s −1 , unless one assumes very hard (q p < 1) proton injection spectra and adopts significantly larger total jet power.…”
Section: 2low Luminosity Bl Lac Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to a formation of Poynting flux dominated outflows. Those in turn can at some point be converted to the matter dominated jets (Komissarov et al 2007;Tchekhovskoy et al 2009;Lyubarsky 2010;Komissarov 2010), with a terminal Lorentz factor Γ ∼ P j /Ṁc 2 where P j is the rate of energy extraction from rotating BH and/or accretion disk andṀ is the mass flux. Depending on whether a jet is launched in the BH magnetosphere or by the accretion disk, the mass flux is expected to be dominated by electron/positron pairs or by protons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%