1984
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.1984.sp002844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnesium Absorption From the Digestive Tract of Sheep

Abstract: SUMMARYFactors affecting absorption of Mg from the ovine rumen have been studied using either a pouch constructed from part of the dorsal rumen or by an isolated washed rumen technique in vivo. Net absorption of Mg against the prevailing electrochemical gradient was observed. An increase in the K/Na ratio within the rumen led to an increase in the potential difference across the rumen wall, blood positive, and to a decrease in the net efflux of Mg from the rumen. This decrease was due to an increase in Mg infl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
77
1
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(22 reference statements)
15
77
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies results established that the absorption of Mg from the temporarily isolated rumen was severely reduced with increasing NH4 + concentrations from 0-40 mmol.l -1 [36]. This decrease agrees with the observation of Care et al [32] in studies with a rumen pouch in sheep. Mg absorption was decreased by ammonia in acute experiments, and this effect was additive to the known depression of K. But it is inconsistent with the findings of [51] who had not noticed any effect for high protein intake or high ruminal NH4 + concentration on apparent Mg digestibility or urinary Mg excretion in conventional balance studies.…”
Section: Nitrogen and Ammoniasupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many studies results established that the absorption of Mg from the temporarily isolated rumen was severely reduced with increasing NH4 + concentrations from 0-40 mmol.l -1 [36]. This decrease agrees with the observation of Care et al [32] in studies with a rumen pouch in sheep. Mg absorption was decreased by ammonia in acute experiments, and this effect was additive to the known depression of K. But it is inconsistent with the findings of [51] who had not noticed any effect for high protein intake or high ruminal NH4 + concentration on apparent Mg digestibility or urinary Mg excretion in conventional balance studies.…”
Section: Nitrogen and Ammoniasupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The (PD)-dependent magnesium absorption is therefore also called potassiumsensitive. The extent of the negative effect of potassium on magnesium absorption depends on the ruminal concentration of magnesium and it has been shown that supplemental magnesium can counteract the inhibitory effect of high levels of dietary potassium [32,33]. The effect of K appears to be dose dependent [34].…”
Section: Potassium and Sodiummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well known that both dietary Mg and K are important determinants of Mg absorption in ruminants (Brown et al, 1978;Martens, 1979;Care et al, 1984;Martens et al, 1987;Leonhard et al, 1989;LeonhardMarek and Martens, 1996). However, Kemp (1960) suggested that dietary CP might interfere with Mg absorption because signs of tetany were observed when cows were fed herbage heavily fertilized with N. However, under controlled feeding conditions, dietary CP did not affect Mg absorption (Grace and MacRae, 1972;Moore et al, 1972;Fontenot et al, 1973;Gä bel and Martens, 1986).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these conditions osmotic water and solvent drag of Mg ++ through the paracellular pathway probably reverses, leading to Mg ++ losses and clinically observed hypomagnesemia (24). (17,65) and have shown that the reduced net Mg ++ transport at high ruminal K + concentrations is closely correlated with electrophysiological changes within the rumen epithelium. a) There is a positive correlation between the (log) K + concentration of the ruminal fluid and the transepithelial potential difference (PD t ) (23, 45, 92; see Table 3 Table 2).…”
Section: Transcellular Intestinal Mgmentioning
confidence: 99%