1992
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2541(92)90135-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magmatism in the South China Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OBS18 did not record useful data. Red dots are the locations of dredged samples (Pautot et al, 1990;Tu et al, 1992;Wang et al, 1984Wang et al, , 2009 and the white star is the location of IODP Site U1431 (Expedition 349 Scientists, 2014). The purple line is MCS profile 973SCSIO1 shown in Figure 9 and white circles are shot numbers.…”
Section: Geological Setting Of the Postspreading Volcanism In The Cenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…OBS18 did not record useful data. Red dots are the locations of dredged samples (Pautot et al, 1990;Tu et al, 1992;Wang et al, 1984Wang et al, , 2009 and the white star is the location of IODP Site U1431 (Expedition 349 Scientists, 2014). The purple line is MCS profile 973SCSIO1 shown in Figure 9 and white circles are shot numbers.…”
Section: Geological Setting Of the Postspreading Volcanism In The Cenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IODP Site U1431 (blue circle) is projected in the N1458 direction on Profile 1. Red dots (D1 and D2 on P2 and P3 profiles, respectively) are locations of projected dredged samples in the N1458 direction (Pautot et al, 1990;Tu et al, 1992;Wang et al, 1984Wang et al, , 2009). The underlying bars represent thin oceanic crust (green), typical oceanic crust (yellow), thick crust with enhanced spreading features (orange), and thick crust with postspreading volcanism (red) based on MCS and refraction data.…”
Section: Accuracy and Resolution Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the crust and the Cenozoic sediments in the Northwest Sub-basin were strongly affected by buried magmatic seamounts (Figures 4); therefore, the density of the buried magmatic seamounts should be assigned to a separate value distinct from those of the crust and the sediments. According to geochemical data for major elements and some trace elements of the basalts sampled at the seamounts and the islands of previous studies [Tu et al, 1992;Yan et al, 2008;Li et al, 1991], this study calculated the density of the basalts sampled at adjacent Daimao, Xianbei, Zhangzhong and Zhenbei seamounts using the (Figure 10). Generally, we can see these density values largely distributed on both sides of 2.65 g/cm 3 , which we assign as the buried magmatic seamounts in the gravity model.…”
Section: Gravity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But to the east, the crustal thickness along profile ESP-W, which crossed the coast line, the PRMB (including the structural units of NFT, Zhu III D, SHASR, Zhu II D and SR) and the QDNB (including CCS), did not decrease monotonically from the continent to the oceanic basin. Rather, the crustal thickness changes from 28-30 km under the coast line, to 15 km below the Zhu III D, to 21-24 km Densities are derived from the geochemical data for major elements and some trace elements of the basalts sampled at the seamounts (such as Daimao, Xianbei, Zhangzhong, and Zhenbei) of previous studies [Tu et al, 1992;Yan et al, 2008;Li et al, 1991] using the calculated method proposed by Zhang et al [2010]. Generally, these density values evenly distribute on both sides of 2.65 g/cm 3 .…”
Section: Crustal Thinningmentioning
confidence: 99%