1986
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(86)80415-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magic numbers in CN+ and CN− abundance distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following our study presented herein, another important question arises about the relative stability between the neutral and cation Met-Cars: will we observe a similar mass distribution change as in Figure if we study the cation clusters under the same cluster source conditions? Similar questions had been discussed in the studies of the stability of C 60 as cations and anions, where it was finally proven experimentally that, depending on the charge state, the cluster source has different optimum conditions for abundant production of C 60 . Based on this intriguing result for C 60 , studies to answer related questions for Met-Cars are to be conducted next.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Following our study presented herein, another important question arises about the relative stability between the neutral and cation Met-Cars: will we observe a similar mass distribution change as in Figure if we study the cation clusters under the same cluster source conditions? Similar questions had been discussed in the studies of the stability of C 60 as cations and anions, where it was finally proven experimentally that, depending on the charge state, the cluster source has different optimum conditions for abundant production of C 60 . Based on this intriguing result for C 60 , studies to answer related questions for Met-Cars are to be conducted next.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…[26] Other abundant fullerenes such as C 36 , C 50 , C 76 , C 78 , and C 84 and so on should be also mentioned (see, for example, Refs. [3,26,27]). The selforganization paradigm does not give any advantage to certain fullerene isomers and even to certain fullerene sizes.…”
Section: Self-organization Paradigm Of Fullerene Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the selforganization paradigm does not give any preference to formation of initial fullerene shells consisting of an even number of atoms relative to shells consisting of an odd number of atoms. For example, mass spectra of carbon clusters produced from graphite by laser ablation [27] and using the pulsed microplasma cluster source [28] show that the fraction of clusters with an odd number of atoms is only several times less than the fraction of even clusters. MD simulations of fullerene formation as a result of self-organization of initially chaotic carbon systems also demonstrate that formation of both even and odd fullerenes takes place.…”
Section: Self-organization Paradigm Of Fullerene Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon clusters in the small size range have been described in many mass spectrometry experiments. Depending on the details of the experiment and the ionization method employed, certain cluster ions stand out as more prominent, and these have been speculated to be more stable based on their enhanced abundances. Of course the most famous example of this occurs in the larger cluster sizes for C 60 and the higher fullerenes. − , Unfortunately, it is now understood that many of the earlier results on smaller clusters were misleading because of the variation of the ionization potential with cluster size and fragmentation in the ionization processes employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%