2017
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAGenTA: a Galaxy implemented tool for complete Tn-Seq analysis and data visualization

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bottlenecks have previously been observed for other host-associated Tn-Seq screens ( 14 ). We adjusted our analysis to account for bottlenecks by first combining all reads per gene and then averaging the 3 replicates per gene ( 18 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bottlenecks have previously been observed for other host-associated Tn-Seq screens ( 14 ). We adjusted our analysis to account for bottlenecks by first combining all reads per gene and then averaging the 3 replicates per gene ( 18 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data analysis was performed using Galaxy and a modified version of the MaGenTA pipeline described previously ( 18 ). Our custom adapters and barcodes are shown in Data Set S1 , and a schematic of library construction is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We monitored the composition of the GAS 5448 Krmit pool en masse to determine differential mutant abundance using DEseq2 [ 69 ] and EdgeR [ 70 ], two bioinformatics pipelines originally designed for RNAseq analyses. Other Tn-seq analysis tools are now available, such as MAGenTA [ 71 , 72 ], which can track all individual insertions and generate fitness values for each insertion (nucleotide resolution). However, DEseq2 and EdgeR have recently gained acceptance for Tn-seq gene fitness analyses based on their availability and ease-of-use [ 58 , 60 , 73 75 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in average gene fitness between treated and untreated conditions (W diff ) were considered significant if they fulfilled the following 3 criteria, with minor modification from those previously described (33): per-gene fitness must be calculated from at least 3 data points, the magnitude of W diff must be > 10%, and q value must be < 0.05 in an unpaired t-test with FDR controlled by the 2-stage step-up method of Benjamini, Krieger and Yekutieli (GraphPad Prism 7). Per-insertion fitness scores within a given genomic region were visualized using Integrative Genomics Viewer software (60) after aggregating all scores across multiple independent transposon mutant libraries using the SingleFitness Perl script (61).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%