2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2004.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mafic magmatic enclaves and mafic rocks associated with some granitoids of the central Sierra Nevada batholith, California: nature, origin, and relations with the hosts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
216
0
16

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 575 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
10
216
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…5B). It is unlikely that this xenolith is cognate to the Jinfosi magma because the amphibolite has distinct mineralogy, texture and isotopic compositions (Barbarin, 2005;Huang et al, 2014). We interpret the xenolith as being country rock captured during magma emplacement.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…5B). It is unlikely that this xenolith is cognate to the Jinfosi magma because the amphibolite has distinct mineralogy, texture and isotopic compositions (Barbarin, 2005;Huang et al, 2014). We interpret the xenolith as being country rock captured during magma emplacement.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The two sets of similar signatures, particularly the zircon Hf-O isotopes, could be the result of one of three processes: (1) zircon grains in the MMEs were transported from the host granitoids during magma mixing, (2) the MMEs and host granitoids attained isotopic equilibration during magma mingling and mixing (e.g., Allen, 1991;Barbarin, 2005;Dorais et al, 1990;Eberz and Nicholls 1990;Tindle, 1991) and (3) the mafic and felsic magmas had similar isotopic compositions (Zi et al, 2012). Although the introduction of crystals, such as K-feldspars, from host to enclave magmas has been documented in this study ( Fig.…”
Section: Implications Of Similar Mme and Host Granitoid Isotopic Compmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely accepted that mafic and felsic microgranular enclaves result from the mixing or mingling of mafic and crustal felsic magmas (e.g., Barbarin, 2005;Blundy and Sparks, 1992;Dorais et al, 1990;Feeley et al, 2008;Sun et al, 2010;Vernon, 1984Vernon, , 1990Wang et al, 2012;Wiebe et al, 1997;Yang et al, 2006Yang et al, , 2007. Two other proposals suggest that they are: (1) fragments of recrystallized, refractory metamorphic rocks or of melt residues from the granite source (e.g., Chappell and White, 1991;Chappell and Wyborn, 2012;Chappell et al, 1987); or (2) cumulates of early-formed crystals or chilled margins (e.g., Bonin, 1991;Collins et al, 2006;Donaire et al, 2005;Shellnutt et al, 2010;Tindle and Pearce, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A very common MME feature at the macro-scale is the occurrence of host-derived crystals (usually plagioclase, K-feldspar, biotite), either within the enclaves or even cross-cutting the contacts between the enclaves and host (e.g. Collins et al 2000;Barbarin, 2005). These features are considered as proofs of mass transfer between the interacting magmas and as indications that the enclaves were in a liquid state upon their incorporation into the more felsic magma (e.g.…”
Section: A Qmzdmentioning
confidence: 99%