2017
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/typhg
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Made in America? Immigrant Occupational Mobility in First Half of the Twentieth Century

Abstract: Assimilation research largely assumes that Southern and Eastern European immigrants achieved assimilation due to job ladders within manufacturing firms in the first half of the twentieth century. But this literature has never tested these claims and often acknowledges that little is known about whether Italians and Slavs experienced upward mobility. Did manufacturing allow for the upward advancement among European-origin groups? Using unique datasets containing employment histories in three manufacturing compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Broadly, these findings highlight that reception context influenced upward mobility in ways consistent with and deviating from contemporary theory (i.e., Portes and Rumbaut 2006). There has been much debate over whether manufacturing opportunities were key to the upward mobility of the historical second generation (see Portes and Rumbaut 2001; Waldinger 2007; Catron 2016). For the Irish second generation at least, this analysis provides little support for the claim that manufacturing mattered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadly, these findings highlight that reception context influenced upward mobility in ways consistent with and deviating from contemporary theory (i.e., Portes and Rumbaut 2006). There has been much debate over whether manufacturing opportunities were key to the upward mobility of the historical second generation (see Portes and Rumbaut 2001; Waldinger 2007; Catron 2016). For the Irish second generation at least, this analysis provides little support for the claim that manufacturing mattered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data limitations have made it difficult to follow immigrants and their descendants across multiple generations. Yet progress is now being made on this score due to innovations in data linkages (e.g., Catron, ). Such work promises to provide new insights about the assimilation process as it unfolds across generations and over time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on immigrant success in the United States at the turn of the twentieth century focuses on numerous dimensions of assimilation. Building off Gordon's (1964) original assimilation paradigm and its later reformulations (Portes and Rumbaut 2001;Alba and Nee 2003), scholars have pointed to ethnic identity and discrimination (Goldstein and Stecklov 2016;Perlmann and Waldinger 1997;Abramitzky, Boustan, Eriksson and Hao, 2020), racialization (Fox 2012, Catron 2021, political incorporation (Catron 2019, Bloemraad 2006, organizations (Catron 2016), geography (Connor 2020), social context (Catron and Vignau Loria 2021;Catron 2020;Fox and Bloemraad 2015), demographic trends (Hout and Goldstein 1994;Sassler 2006;Pagnini and Morgan 1990;Morgan et al 1993) and their connection to labor market processes (Abramitzky, Boustan, Eriksson, 2014).…”
Section: Linguistic Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 99%