2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macular versus Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Parameters for Diagnosing Manifest Glaucoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
72
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
6
72
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…GCC thickness, complementary to pRNFL thickness, also showed good glaucoma-diagnostic ability 7. A recent meta-analysis by Oddone et al revealed that the glaucoma-diagnostic ability of the macular parameters is comparable to that of the RNFL ones for diagnosis of manifest glaucoma 29. Their results for GCIPL thickness showed that the best parameters were inferior RNFL thickness and minimum GCIPL thickness, with sensitivities of 0.80 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.89) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.86), respectively, and for GCC thickness, the best parameters were global loss volume (for RTVue OCT) and the inferior sector (for Topcon 3D-OCT) with sensitivities of 0.64 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.79) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.76), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GCC thickness, complementary to pRNFL thickness, also showed good glaucoma-diagnostic ability 7. A recent meta-analysis by Oddone et al revealed that the glaucoma-diagnostic ability of the macular parameters is comparable to that of the RNFL ones for diagnosis of manifest glaucoma 29. Their results for GCIPL thickness showed that the best parameters were inferior RNFL thickness and minimum GCIPL thickness, with sensitivities of 0.80 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.89) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.86), respectively, and for GCC thickness, the best parameters were global loss volume (for RTVue OCT) and the inferior sector (for Topcon 3D-OCT) with sensitivities of 0.64 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.79) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.76), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38-40 Evidence to date suggests that it provides better diagnostic performance than OCT assessment of the macula in glaucoma, 5,6 though it will sometimes miss highly localized damage that can be detected by macular OCT analysis. 41 Average peripapillary RNFLT is highly repeatable; in a study using the Cirrus OCT (Carl-Zeiss Meditec Inc.) it was reported to have a 1.9% intra-visit coefficient of variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Glaucomatous eyes have been shown to have reduced retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), 2,3 optic nerve head minimum rim width (MRW), 4 and macular inner retinal layer thickness, 5,6 among other structural abnormalities that can be quantified using OCT. Furthermore, reductions in these measures correlate with reduced function, 2,7,8 and imaging tests are preferred over perimetry by patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Banister et al 5 (see page 930) conducted a diagnostic accuracy study of 3 imaging technologies in a large cohort of patients referred with a possible diagnosis of glaucoma. Oddone et al 6 (see page 939) carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that compared the diagnostic accuracy of retinal nerve fiber parameters and macular parameters using the same imaging technology, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other study in this issue, Oddone et al 6 present a systematic review and meta- analysis of 32 diagnostic studies comparing macular parameters with RNFL parameters for diagnosing glaucoma. This study used OCT data from a related systematic review that the same group has published in The Cochrane Library .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%