2005
DOI: 10.1097/00006982-200506000-00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macular Hole Formation in Postvitrectomized Eyes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both studies support the theory of glial cell migration along the outer retinal surface after an overlying inner retinal degeneration with spontaneous dehiscence of the umbo. 10,11 Although all the holes in our study were located eccentrically, there may well be a shared mechanism. Although the ILM was not removed in every case (five of six 6 cases), ICG dye was used in all six.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Both studies support the theory of glial cell migration along the outer retinal surface after an overlying inner retinal degeneration with spontaneous dehiscence of the umbo. 10,11 Although all the holes in our study were located eccentrically, there may well be a shared mechanism. Although the ILM was not removed in every case (five of six 6 cases), ICG dye was used in all six.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…[4][5][6][7] Several small case series have described MH formation after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). [8][9][10][11][12][13] As in most of these eyes, the vitreous was already detached before the vitrectomy and was removed in all of them at the vitrectomy; the mechanism actually responsible for the formation of MHs remains unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MH formation without a vitreoretinal traction, even with a pre-existing complete posterior vitreous detachment or deep vitrectomy history, have been reported 21, 22, 23, 24, 25. Trophic alteration in the retina and vascular alterations have been hypothesized in eyes with MH 3, 4, 7…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%