2011
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macular Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer: Automated Detection and Thickness Reproducibility with Spectral Domain–Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma

Abstract: Segmentation and measurement of GCIPL thickness were successful in 50 of 51 subjects. All ICCs ranged between 0.94 and 0.98, but ICCs for average and superior GCIPL parameters (0.97-0.98) were slightly higher than for inferior GCIPL parameters (0.94-0.97). All COVs were <5%, with 1.8% for average GCIPL and COVs for superior GCIPL parameters (2.2%-3.0%) slightly lower than those for inferior GCIPL parameters (2.5%-3.6%). The TRTSD was lowest for average GCIPL (1.16 μm) and varied from 1.43 to 2.15 μm for sector… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
339
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 385 publications
(352 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
13
339
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only axons from RGCs on the nasal side of the ONH were not mixed up. In addition, the Cirrus OCT measured the GCIPL thickness in an elliptical area around the fovea [12]. Since approximately 50% of the RGCs are concentrated within 4.5 mm of the fovea [14], thinning of the macular GCIPL can be better visualized topographically, compared to thinning of the RNFL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only axons from RGCs on the nasal side of the ONH were not mixed up. In addition, the Cirrus OCT measured the GCIPL thickness in an elliptical area around the fovea [12]. Since approximately 50% of the RGCs are concentrated within 4.5 mm of the fovea [14], thinning of the macular GCIPL can be better visualized topographically, compared to thinning of the RNFL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GCA algorithm compares the values with an internal normative database, and generates thickness and color-coded deviation maps, and a significance map to match GCIPL thickness, with values within the normal range in green (P = 5% -95%), borderline values in yellow (1% < P < 5%), and values outside the normal range in red (P < 1%). Details of the manner in which GCIPL thickness measurements are conducted have been given elsewhere [12], [13]. Using SD-OCT, the RNFL thickness was measured in the optic disc cube 200 × 200 scan mode.…”
Section: A Optical Coherence Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the algorithm has been presented in detail. 13 During the scanning, the subject's pupil was first centered and focused in the iris viewport and the linescanning ophthalmoscope with 'auto focus' mode was then used to optimize the view of the retina. The 'center' and 'enhance' modes were used to optimize the Z-offset and scan polarization, respectively, for the OCT scan to maximize the OCT signal.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following macular GCIPL thickness measurements were analyzed: average, minimum, and sectoral (superonasal, superior, superotemporal, inferotemporal, inferior, and inferonasal). 11,12 In SD-OCT technology, the light from the reference arm interferes with the light reflected back from the different layers of the retina, generating spectral interference fringes. This fringe pattern is processed by a high-speed spectrometer, and then undergoes transformation to create a reflectivity profile in depth.…”
Section: Sd-octmentioning
confidence: 99%