1967
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1967.00980020165004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macular Function and the Photostress Test 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 34 Clinical photostress refers to classic scotomatic glare 30 40 41 caused by photopigment bleaching, regeneration, and associated psychophysical processes. [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] Clinical terminology will be used throughout the rest of this perspective.…”
Section: Glare and Photostressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 34 Clinical photostress refers to classic scotomatic glare 30 40 41 caused by photopigment bleaching, regeneration, and associated psychophysical processes. [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] Clinical terminology will be used throughout the rest of this perspective.…”
Section: Glare and Photostressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 1967a). The same researchers also suggested that this test may be useful in distinguishing macular disease from optic nerve disease (Severin et al. , 1967b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in a transient state of insensitivity subjectively perceived as a scotomatous after-image. Visual function returns as the retinal pigments are resynthesised in the outer segments of the photoreceptors, and is dependent upon the integrity of the photoreceptors and the retinal pigment epithelium without involvement of other neural mechanisms [16][17][18]. The test has been used clinically to evaluate retinal, and particulary macular, function [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has led to wide disagreement as to the origin of contrast sensitivity loss with age [7]. Severin et al [17] found a difference in PSRT between subjects above and below 40 years of age. They used an elaborate apparatus including a xenon flash-tube and a GoldmannWeekers adaptometer, and account was taken of differences in pupil size with age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%