1977
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(77)90187-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macular Colobomas in Leber's Congenital Amaurosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geographic pattern or islands of the lesions were different from the fundus lesions of typical retinitis pigmentosa and pigmented paravenous retinochoroidal atrophy [7]. Peripapillary tapetoretinal dis turbance was reported in 2 siblings with macular colobomas and Leber's congenital amaurosis [5], The lesions in our patient could be differentiated from Leber's congen ital amaurosis, which involves severe visual impairment at birth or shortly thereafter, nystagmus, and an absent or markedly dete riorated ERG. Congenital retinal dystrophy associated with bilateral macular colobomas was previously shown by Moore et al [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The geographic pattern or islands of the lesions were different from the fundus lesions of typical retinitis pigmentosa and pigmented paravenous retinochoroidal atrophy [7]. Peripapillary tapetoretinal dis turbance was reported in 2 siblings with macular colobomas and Leber's congenital amaurosis [5], The lesions in our patient could be differentiated from Leber's congen ital amaurosis, which involves severe visual impairment at birth or shortly thereafter, nystagmus, and an absent or markedly dete riorated ERG. Congenital retinal dystrophy associated with bilateral macular colobomas was previously shown by Moore et al [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Several reports have described patients with macular colo boma combined with peripheral retinal changes such as retinitis pigmentosa [4], Leber's congenital amaurosis [5], pigmented paravenous retino-choroidal atrophy [7], and congenital retinal dystrophy [10]. To our knowledge, progressive peripheral retinal changes in association with macular coloboma are rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,17,18,20,21 Several cases of bilateral macular coloboma associated with different manifestations of peripheral chorioretinal inherited dystrophy have been previously reported. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Also, keratoconus has been described in patients with these ophthalmoscopic findings, but they were always nonfamilial cases. 4,5 The male members of this Caucasian family were affected by different typical RP phenotypes, 20,21 characterised by the presence of mid-peripheral bone spicules involving, respectively, the entire retina (classic RP; Case 1 and also the deceased father of the siblings) and only a retinal sector (sector RP; Case 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of the condition) among those patients with a hereditary or family origin, [1][2][3] and among those with other ocular or systemic abnormalities. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Several reports have described patients with macular coloboma associated with peripheral retinal changes such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP), 4 retinal aplasia, 5 Leber's congenital amaurosis, 6,7 retinal dystrophy, 8,9 progressive atrophy of the peripheral retina, 10 or pigmented paravenous retinochoroidal atrophy. 11 The purpose of this paper is to present the clinical characteristics in three adult siblings who exhibited a bilateral macular coloboma (early-onset macular dystrophies/atrophic changes), associated with different RP phenotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter family appears to have a very early onset progressive cone-rod dystrophy with blindness by age 30. The other form of autosomal recessive congenital pigmentary retinopathy have macular staphylomata, also commmonly called colobomata, even though the abnormality is not due to an embryonic failure in closure of midline structures (Freedman, 1971;Margolis, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%