2004
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.566.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrourimegatrema brayi n. gen., n. sp. (Digenea: Opecoelidae) from four species of deep-sea macrourid fishes from the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea, with a list of endohelminths reported from species of Bathygadus and Gadomus (Macrouridae)

Abstract: Macrourimegatrema brayi n. gen., n. sp. (Digenea: Opecoelidae: Plagioporinae) is described from the pyloric ceca and intestines of 4 species of bathygadine macrourid fishes collected from deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico and off Colombia and Panama. Macrourimegatrema n. gen. can be distinguished from all other genera in the subfamily by possessing a combination of the following diagnostic characteristics: an atypically large elongate body; a short, distinct forebody separated from a long hindbody by a distinc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 728 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observed this same feature in several specimens of M. brayi. While the current generic diagnosis of Macrourimegatrema is already unique (Blend et al, 2004) when compared to other opecoelid genera in the key to the Plagioporinae of Cribb (2005), we feel this feature may be of additional generic importance, since it was observed in both M. brayi and M. gadoma n. sp. It is also important to note that a few specimens identified as M. brayi (based on the extent and distribution of the vitellarium) were twice recovered from four specimens of Gadomus arcuatus (see Blend et al, 2004) in concurrent infections with M. gadoma n. sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We also observed this same feature in several specimens of M. brayi. While the current generic diagnosis of Macrourimegatrema is already unique (Blend et al, 2004) when compared to other opecoelid genera in the key to the Plagioporinae of Cribb (2005), we feel this feature may be of additional generic importance, since it was observed in both M. brayi and M. gadoma n. sp. It is also important to note that a few specimens identified as M. brayi (based on the extent and distribution of the vitellarium) were twice recovered from four specimens of Gadomus arcuatus (see Blend et al, 2004) in concurrent infections with M. gadoma n. sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…While the current generic diagnosis of Macrourimegatrema is already unique (Blend et al, 2004) when compared to other opecoelid genera in the key to the Plagioporinae of Cribb (2005), we feel this feature may be of additional generic importance, since it was observed in both M. brayi and M. gadoma n. sp. It is also important to note that a few specimens identified as M. brayi (based on the extent and distribution of the vitellarium) were twice recovered from four specimens of Gadomus arcuatus (see Blend et al, 2004) in concurrent infections with M. gadoma n. sp. Because of the distinct differences, such as the extent and distribution of the vitelline fields, body size (Table 1) and position of the gonads relative to the entire worm as well as the small number of M. brayi found in G. arcuatus (intensity 1-2 worms) by Blend et al (2004), we believe the two to be different species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…nov. fits into group C (sensu Bray 1987), with the testes tandem rather than oblique and a cirrus sac that extends into the hindbody. According to Blend et al (2004), there are nine species of Allopodocotyle in this group: A. pedicellata, A. atzi (Nigrelli, 1939), A. mecopera (Manter, 1940), A. argyropsi Madhavi, 1975, A. lutianusi Gupta et Ahamad, 1976, A. israelensis, A. jaffensis, A. recifensis Bray, 1987and A. margolisi Gibson, 1995. Among these species, A. margolisi fits into any of Bray's groups, but it is most similar to the worms in group C except that its cirrus-sac does not extend into the hindbody (Gibson 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%