Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! - CSCL '05 2005
DOI: 10.3115/1149293.1149388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroscopic study of the social networks formed in web-based discussion forums

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of analysing the relationships between web forum users on the structure of the network (reconstructed from the messages sent) were studied in1314. Also, the type of interaction or content being exchanged have been considered616.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of analysing the relationships between web forum users on the structure of the network (reconstructed from the messages sent) were studied in1314. Also, the type of interaction or content being exchanged have been considered616.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the asymmetrical functional form of the penetration curve, we simulated adoption on a 100,000-node network for different classes of networks. Adoption processes under each of four common classes of network degree distributions-Gaussian, uniform, lognormal, and scale-free-are given in Figures 1(a)-1(d), respectively, (for empirical examples of these networks distributions, see Amaral et al 2000, Barabási and Albert 1999, Liben-Nowell and Kleinberg 2008, Limpert et al 2001, Newman 2005, Newman et al 2002, Yeung 2005.…”
Section: Degree Heterogeneity Leads To Highly Skewed Adoption Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because network structure is typically invisible, the few diffusion models that incorporate network structure do so by resorting to rough assumptions (e.g., division into two markets) that oversimplify the diffusion process and its dynamics. One of these oversimplifying assumptions in the literature is that networks generally exhibit scale-free degree distributions, 1 despite the fact that other types of distributions have been documented in studies of social networks, including Gaussian/Poissonian distributions in offline social groups (Amaral et al 2000), online forums, and active email networks (Liben-Nowell and Kleinberg 2008, Newman et al 2002, Yeung 2005, as well as lognormal distributions in a Web linkage structure and in online social networks (Gomez et al 2009, Pennock et al 2002, Stutzbach and Rejaie 2005. Here, we model the network structure-specifically, its degree distribution-and we investigate its effect on the adoption curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary answers to the "how" come from several works that analyzed the "macroscopic" effects (effects on structure) depending on relationships reconstructed from the messages sent [13,14] or also considering the type of interaction being held [15]. This trend on acquiring knowledge from interactions was also followed by Erlin et al, who considered the content under discussion in addition to the interactions themselves [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%