2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.04047
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroscopic loops in the Bose gas, Spin O(N) and related models

Abstract: We consider a general system of interacting random loops which includes several models of interest, such as the Spin O(N) model, random lattice permutations, a version of the interacting Bose gas in discrete space and of the loop O(N) model. We consider the system in Z d , d ≥ 3, and prove the occurrence of macroscopic loops whose length is proportional to the volume of the system. More precisely, we approximate Z d by finite boxes and, given any two vertices whose distance is proportional to the diameter of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another extension of the method deals with "chessboard estimates", proposed by Fröhlich and Lieb [16] (they were partly motivated by [23]). Among many interesting works that use these ideas, let us mention the flux phase problem [30,35]; spin reflection positivity applied to Hubbard models [31,43,44]; itinerant electron models [32][33][34]; high spin systems whose classical limit has long-range order [6,7]; spin nematic phases [4,42]; Néel order in spin-1 model with biquadratic interactions [29]; hard-core bosons [1,26]; loop models associated with quantum spin systems [47] (motivated by [2,45]) and other loop models associated with classical spin systems [39]. Finally, let us mention an alternate extension of [17] to quantum systems by Albert, Ferrari, Fröhlich, and Schlein [3].…”
Section: The Quest For Understanding Phase Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another extension of the method deals with "chessboard estimates", proposed by Fröhlich and Lieb [16] (they were partly motivated by [23]). Among many interesting works that use these ideas, let us mention the flux phase problem [30,35]; spin reflection positivity applied to Hubbard models [31,43,44]; itinerant electron models [32][33][34]; high spin systems whose classical limit has long-range order [6,7]; spin nematic phases [4,42]; Néel order in spin-1 model with biquadratic interactions [29]; hard-core bosons [1,26]; loop models associated with quantum spin systems [47] (motivated by [2,45]) and other loop models associated with classical spin systems [39]. Finally, let us mention an alternate extension of [17] to quantum systems by Albert, Ferrari, Fröhlich, and Schlein [3].…”
Section: The Quest For Understanding Phase Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%