2014 American Control Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2014.6859026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroscopic freeway model calibration with partially observed data, a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One important limitation of such datasets is that they are initially introduced to collect aggregated data relevant for calibrating and validating macroscopic descriptions of the traffic flow [9,10,11,12]. Microscopic descriptions of traffic [13,14,15,16,17] can be challenging to validate in detail without data at the level of the individual vehicle.…”
Section: Motivation: the Need For Empirical Traffic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important limitation of such datasets is that they are initially introduced to collect aggregated data relevant for calibrating and validating macroscopic descriptions of the traffic flow [9,10,11,12]. Microscopic descriptions of traffic [13,14,15,16,17] can be challenging to validate in detail without data at the level of the individual vehicle.…”
Section: Motivation: the Need For Empirical Traffic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attacks for the first example, box objective (to be described), use a macroscopic freeway model of a 19.4 mile stretch of the I15 South Freeway in San Diego California. The model was split into 125 links with 9 onramps and was calibrated [58,59] using loop-detector measurements available through the PeMS loop-detector system [1]. Figure 3(a) is a Space-time diagram of the I15 freeway.…”
Section: First Attack: Congestion-on-demandmentioning
confidence: 99%