1990
DOI: 10.1002/micr.1920110309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroreplantation: An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Factors that must be considered include the predicted morbidity for the patient, the expected chance of survival of the thumb and functional outcome of the replanted part, and the total cost incurred by the patient or third party payer. 3 Comparison of functional results between previously published series is always difficult due to existing differences in the patient population, type of traumatic amputation, parts replanted, and in the methods of evaluation applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Factors that must be considered include the predicted morbidity for the patient, the expected chance of survival of the thumb and functional outcome of the replanted part, and the total cost incurred by the patient or third party payer. 3 Comparison of functional results between previously published series is always difficult due to existing differences in the patient population, type of traumatic amputation, parts replanted, and in the methods of evaluation applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vessel damage from crush injury significantly limits the efficacy of revascularization of the digit. 1,3 Despite resection of the segments most severely injured as visualized microscopically, thrombosis rates are predictably higher in revascularized digits that underwent crush or avulsion injury prior to reanastamosis. The etiology of this increased thrombogenesis potential in the grossly normal vessel is poorly understood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thrombosis of digital vessels at the anastomosis site following replantation due to a crush injury remains a significant problem in microsurgery. [1][2][3][4] Disruption of digital vessels secondary to a crushing mechanism is related to significantly lower anastomotic success rates than those for uncrushed vessels. [1][2][3] Despite adequate resection of damaged vessels and either primary anastomosis of the remaining vessels or use of vein grafts, thrombosis continues to occur frequently in vessels that have undergone crush or avulsion injuries.…”
Section: Abstract: Vascular Spasm Crush Injury Microsurgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meticulous history from witnesses should be obtained. 4 The limb should be handled as gently as possible. Ideally only one doctor should touch the limb to avoid crushing or contamination of any tissue.…”
Section: Amputated Limb: Preoperative Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%